Originally posted by Grits
I dont want to speak for Oldman, but I think he means MA style base capture when he says "landgrab".
Actually, Grits did a pretty thorough job of speaking for me. The type of landgrab I object to is just what he says: swarming the base with overwhelming numbers, vulching anyone who tries to take off, that sort of thing. For all I know, this may be the only way to actually take a base; if so, I object to base taking, not just landgrabbing.
What we saw last night, and a week ago with the big P-47 raid, and on other occasions, was an announced raid at an undisclosed target. This lets a cohesive opposition form, but keeps them guessing about the exact target. Probably it will not usually end in a base capture, but who cares? Bomb a GV base, or a factory, or something like that. There will be some sort of damage which can be assessed for the bomber folks, the fighter people will have real fights using more-or-less authentic escort and interception tactics, and the whole thing ends up being lots of fun for everyone. Seems to me that whenever this sort of mission takes place, the boards the next day are full of compliments to the assaulting force. It doesn't take forever, like the dedicated SEA events do; it can almost be done off the cuff, when the urge strikes any given group of people.
- oldman