Author Topic: WTF is DICK so 2 faced  (Read 1258 times)

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2004, 09:07:52 AM »
Quote
at least you will be able to have gay marriages


Be careful.  You are skirting the fringes of personal attack.  Got anything else cupcake?

I doubt it

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2004, 09:09:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by strk


BTW genius - North Korea, China has WMD - when are we going to invade them??  I dont see you enlisting for the job.  Arent you a stand up guy Rip



Weak weak weak, that arguement is sooo yesterday...can't you come up with more current wacko left wing liberal stuff?  I know I could find you some if you need help.

Nevermind that Iraq,unlike North Korea, which has had 50 years of relative peace with its neighbors,has gone to war twice with neighboring countries and has used chemical warfare on its own citizens.   Nevermind that North Korea’s military is three times larger than Iraq’s. A war with North Korea will require 700,000 troops, almost three times the number being sent into Iraq. Nevermind that Seoul, South Korea, is within striking range of North Korea's missiles. The city would be a likely target should the U.S. strike North Korea. Up until quite recently, South Korea has been a supportive ally of the U.S. Considering the risk of nuclear war from taking on a nuclear power, the Bush administration has chosen to engage in diplomacy first, using China as a conduit to pressure Pyongyang into halting its program to enrich uranium for weapons.

The U.N. Security Council had given Saddam Hussein ultimatum after ultimatum, and if the Left had its way, would give him countless more before ever authorizing war. Funny how the Left is so quick to criticize Bush for not going after North Korea without so much as a peep demanding a single ultimatum against them first.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2004, 09:15:12 AM by Ripsnort »

Offline mosgood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2004, 09:18:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Last sentence above, sounds like a good cause to invade Iraq, no?


???  So the only time to listen to him is when he aggrees with what you want to hear?  So using what he said about WMD is ammunition for what Boy George did (if it's a positive for him) but anything he says about your hero (that is negative) is abviously a lie and should be discounted??


amazing.......

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2004, 09:20:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by mosgood
???  So the only time to listen to him is when he aggrees with what you want to hear?  So using what he said about WMD is ammunition for what Boy George did (if it's a positive for him) but anything he says about your hero (that is negative) is abviously a lie and should be discounted??


amazing.......


No, I'm asking you a question...either you agree with him or not...which is it or do you agree with him only when it suits Bush bashing?  This guy has been shown to be sooo inconsistent but never mind that! He's bashing Bush! Get out of his way! :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18949
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2004, 09:56:00 AM »
what don't you realize?

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

why didn't he come out before this?

because...

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

silly libs - grab at anything or anyone to slam the POTUS
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2004, 09:58:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Weak weak weak, that arguement is sooo yesterday...can't you come up with more current wacko left wing liberal stuff?  I know I could find you some if you need help.

Nevermind that Iraq,unlike North Korea, which has had 50 years of relative peace with its neighbors,has gone to war twice with neighboring countries and has used chemical warfare on its own citizens.   Nevermind that North Korea’s military is three times larger than Iraq’s. A war with North Korea will require 700,000 troops, almost three times the number being sent into Iraq. Nevermind that Seoul, South Korea, is within striking range of North Korea's missiles. The city would be a likely target should the U.S. strike North Korea. Up until quite recently, South Korea has been a supportive ally of the U.S. Considering the risk of nuclear war from taking on a nuclear power, the Bush administration has chosen to engage in diplomacy first, using China as a conduit to pressure Pyongyang into halting its program to enrich uranium for weapons.

The U.N. Security Council had given Saddam Hussein ultimatum after ultimatum, and if the Left had its way, would give him countless more before ever authorizing war. Funny how the Left is so quick to criticize Bush for not going after North Korea without so much as a peep demanding a single ultimatum against them first.


if this argument is so "yesterday" and easily refutable by your superioir right wing mind, why didnt you discuss China?  They have nukes, unfriendly relations with the US (remember the spy plane, ballistic missles into sea of japan, taiwan, etc?)

And North Korea as been proliferating their weapons production systems, as has Pakistan.  When do we invade Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Lybia

Or for the human rights excuse (Saddam was evil madman who tortured his people) - we are going to the Congo next, then CHina etc

PLEASE - the REASON WE ARE IN IRAQ IS BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THE OIL IS

no other reason.  Blood for oil.  And you support that.  Sorry but I dont subscribe to that philosphy.  

like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders . . .

on edit - btw the UN sanctions and inspections were working - even David Kay said so
« Last Edit: March 30, 2004, 10:02:41 AM by strk »

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2004, 10:01:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
what don't you realize?

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

why didn't he come out before this?

because...

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

silly libs - grab at anything or anyone to slam the POTUS


Uhhh - the book was held up because the White House had to vet it first - and remove some parts

Clarke has done great damage to Bush* - he didnt do that to Reagan, BushI or CLinton - he could have writtne books on any of them

why now?  MAYBE it is because Bush* and co are little more than thugs and gangsters.  Clarke has impeccable credibility, despite the RW smear machine - which you and the other wingnuts are so eager to be a part of.

Offline mosgood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2004, 10:33:07 AM »
Are you asking, Do I agree with Bush or Clark?

Bush- I personlly DO think that Georgy had warning before 9/11  and didn't do enough.  Not because he didn't give a sh..  but because he didn't think it was going to be as bad as it was and just didn't think it justified declaring an emergency.  I really think he was too busy trying to improve his approval points (which I believe where in the toilet at that time) Now, I think he's just covering his bellybutton (like every other politician would).  I think that he was just the poor sap in the office at that terrible time.

Personally, while I don't LIKE George, I agree with cleaning house in Afghanistan.  I DO think he did a lot of spinning of the truth about WMD in Iraq and should swing for it.  And even if he thought it was the whole truth and nothin but... he should be responsible for the error and swing anyways.  For Gods sake, if we don't hold our presidents responsible for what they say, we're in deep doodoo.  You can't be making those mistakes when justifying going to war.  


Clark-  I think that 3 presidents believed him, and kept him around for a reason.  And now that he is speaking out about Georgy, he is now being discredited.

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2004, 11:26:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
what don't you realize?

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

why didn't he come out before this?

because...

THE MAN IS SELLING HIS BOOK!

silly libs - grab at anything or anyone to slam the POTUS


A book that the white house had a year to review before it was published. And a book that the white house cannot argue with.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2004, 12:04:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by strk

PLEASE - the REASON WE ARE IN IRAQ IS BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THE OIL IS

no other reason.  Blood for oil.  And you support that.  Sorry but I dont subscribe to that philosphy.  


THEN WHY ARE THE GAS PRICES STILL RISING! LOL!

Not one drop of oil has changed that, son.

Blood for oil! LOL!  Okay, resume your brainwashing.

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2004, 12:08:18 PM »
Clarke testified under oath. Something the bush people wont due. Although they are letting Rice testify if the commision signs an agreement that no other white house personal has to testify before the 9/11 commision.

What do they have to hide?

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18949
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2004, 12:26:44 PM »
Clarke has done ZERO damage to Bush

Bush's poll numbers continue to rise as anyone with half a brain, eliminates many here, see clarke for what he is - bitter, ex employee trying to SELL HIS BOOK
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2004, 12:35:04 PM »
Yes eagler, but if clarke is lieing then why isnt he going to jail? He did testify under oath.

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2004, 12:38:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
Clarke has done ZERO damage to Bush

Bush's poll numbers continue to rise as anyone with half a brain, eliminates many here, see clarke for what he is - bitter, ex employee trying to SELL HIS BOOK


A bitter ex-employee of 30 years under 4 different presidents..  Repub and demo..

The ideas the some are willing to unquestionably believe and the ideas backed up by fact, paper-trails, and corroborated testimony that some are willing to deny.. wow.. just wow...

dude

Offline Goth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
WTF is DICK so 2 faced
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2004, 12:43:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by strk


PLEASE - the REASON WE ARE IN IRAQ IS BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THE OIL IS

no other reason.  Blood for oil.  And you support that.  Sorry but I dont subscribe to that philosphy.  

 


No, but following your logic we should be invading FUSSR (love that F from the other thread) and Venezuala.