Author Topic: Clarke Under Oath  (Read 168 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Clarke Under Oath
« on: March 30, 2004, 08:04:38 AM »
Posted without comment:


Quote


OPINION - REVIEW & OUTLOOK




Mr. Clarke's Admission

March 30, 2004, Wall Street Journal



If President Bush had followed every last letter of Richard Clarke's recommendations starting Inauguration Day, it still would not have prevented 9/11.

How do we know this?  Richard Clarke says so.

Here's how the disgruntled National Security Council veteran put it last week in an exchange with Slade Gorton, a member of the 9/11 Commission and former Washington Senator:

Mr. Gorton:  "Assuming that the recommendations that you made on January 25 of 2001 . . . including aid to the Northern Alliance which had been an agenda item at this point for two and a half years without any action, assuming that there had been more Predator reconnaissance missions, assuming that that had all been adopted, say, on January 26, year 2001, is there the remotest chance that it would have prevented 9/11?"

Mr. Clarke:  "No."

Mr. Gorton:  "It just would have allowed our response after 9/11 to be perhaps a little bit faster?"

Mr. Clarke:  "Well, the response would have begun before 9/11."

Mr. Gorton:  "But -- yes, but we weren't going to -- there was no recommendation on your part or anyone else's part that we declare war and attempt to invade Afghanistan prior to 9/11?"

Mr. Clarke:  "That's right."

This startling exchange got almost no media attention last week.  Mr. Clarke has rocketed to national fame over the past 10 days by alleging the Bush Administration was negligently inattentive to the al Qaeda threat.  He took it upon himself to "apologize" on behalf of "your government" to the families of 9/11 victims, as if there had been policy options on the table -- perhaps offered by him -- that might have prevented their deaths.

But when pressed on that point under oath, Mr. Clarke was forced to concede that the impression he'd created, the very reason anyone was paying any attention to him, was false. As long as Mr. Clarke is in the apology business, can we have one for wasting a week of the Administration's precious anti-terror time?

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18655
Clarke Under Oath
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2004, 08:05:58 AM »
but that doesn't sell his book ...
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Clarke Under Oath
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2004, 08:06:54 AM »
Quote
But when pressed on that point under oath, Mr. Clarke was forced to concede that the impression he'd created, the very reason anyone was paying any attention to him, was false. As long as Mr. Clarke is in the apology business, can we have one for wasting a week of the Administration's precious anti-terror time?
[/b]

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Clarke Under Oath
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2004, 08:09:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
but that doesn't sell his book ...


60 minutes does! Why, they're the voice of the truth! ;)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Clarke Under Oath
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2004, 08:10:00 AM »
Hear that sound?  its just another grinding axe.  libtards be damned.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns