Author Topic: O'Reilly Viewer Mail  (Read 1552 times)

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« on: March 30, 2004, 10:16:25 AM »
"The 9/11 Congressional Hearings are basically saying that the Bush Administration / USA failed and should have pre-emptively struck AL Qaeda before 9/11 happened. Isn't this what we did to Iraq?"

Just had to share.  ;)

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2004, 10:36:07 AM »
buying souls Saurd?  I always suspected you had horns and caried a pitchfork

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18758
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2004, 10:49:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by strk
buying souls Saurd?  I always suspected you had horns and caried a pitchfork


LOL - good come back
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2004, 10:56:15 AM »
Its a social experiment, strk.  You looking to sell?  ;)

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2004, 11:01:40 AM »
Strk
 Are you the tower number 7 guy?

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Re: O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2004, 11:42:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
"The 9/11 Congressional Hearings are basically saying that the Bush Administration / USA failed and should have pre-emptively struck AL Qaeda before 9/11 happened. Isn't this what we did to Iraq?"

Just had to share.  ;)


Pre-emptive would imply that they hadn't attacked at all wouldn't it?

Kinda like Iraq hadn't attacked at all.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Re: O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2004, 12:11:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Pre-emptive would imply that they hadn't attacked at all wouldn't it?

Kinda like Iraq hadn't attacked at all.


Ding, ding, ding.

The mind of a Bush hater is a strange and dangerous place.  It is capable of blaming Bush for 9/11 because he didnt preemptively strike at Al Qaeda before the attack and criticizing his preemptive attack on iraq before Saddam could do any damage in the same breath.

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2004, 01:24:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by strk
buying souls Saurd?  I always suspected you had horns and caried a pitchfork


Im a good southern baptist who has accepted Jesus Christ as my personal saviour

"for I am the way, the truth and the light.  No man cometh unto the father but by me" (as best I can remember)

so in short, my soul belongs to Jesus

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2004, 01:34:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2
Strk
 Are you the tower number 7 guy?


:rofl

Offline MJHerman

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: Re: Re: O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2004, 01:36:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Ding, ding, ding.

The mind of a Bush hater is a strange and dangerous place.  It is capable of blaming Bush for 9/11 because he didnt preemptively strike at Al Qaeda before the attack and criticizing his preemptive attack on iraq before Saddam could do any damage in the same breath.


As is the mind of a Bush drone....

I think he was trying to point out that there is no logic in launching a pre-emptive attack against someone who was a threat to his neighbours but no direct threat to the United States (either historically or going forward).  Unless you buy into that whole "the WMD are there, I swear" or "Osama and Saddam are best buddies" thing.

Offline strk

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2004, 01:50:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
:rofl


what are you laughing at, cupcake?

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2004, 01:53:47 PM »
Everytime I see strk's posts and the Howard Dean avatar, all I can hear is the Dean "Arrrrggggghhhhhhh!" sound byte.   :rofl

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Re: Re: Re: O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2004, 02:22:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MJHerman
As is the mind of a Bush drone....

I think he was trying to point out that there is no logic in launching a pre-emptive attack against someone who was a threat to his neighbours but no direct threat to the United States (either historically or going forward).  Unless you buy into that whole "the WMD are there, I swear" or "Osama and Saddam are best buddies" thing.


LOL - WOW!  How did you get THAT!?!

(see?)

The gentlemen that made the statement is bringing light to the fact that very same people who are bashing Bush for going into Iraq 'unprovoked' are also bashing him for not doing something about Al Qaeda before they 'provoked' us.

to you sir - I wouldnt want my name signed beneath your 'take' on the statement.  Some serious balls.  :aok

Love,

Drone #030177

Offline Munkii

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 552
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2004, 02:51:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
The gentlemen that made the statement is bringing light to the fact that very same people who are bashing Bush for going into Iraq 'unprovoked' are also bashing him for not doing something about Al Qaeda before they 'provoked' us.


Then the man is wrong on both accounts.  USS Cole, Embassy bombings, and other attacks were Al Queda.   Firing at US Airplanes patrolling the No Fly Zone that Saddam agreed to (I think he did at the cease fire, I can't remember) meant that both had provoked us.  Although I didn't agree with the Invasion of Iraq at that time.  I thought we should have finished up plundering Al Queda at least.

Offline WilldCrd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2565
      • http://www.wildaces.org
O'Reilly Viewer Mail
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2004, 03:00:48 PM »
sell ya mine saur BUT only iffen I can have the 007 designation
Crap now I gotta redo my cool sig.....crap!!! I cant remeber how to do it all !!!!!