« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: 700 dead  (Read 2058 times)

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
700 dead
« Reply #30 on: March 31, 2004, 02:52:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
Man your dumb.


Not nearly so dumb as you...

quit wasting your parents money and study....



:rolleyes:
Logged
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline capt. apathy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4240
      • http://www.moviewavs.com/cgi-bin/moviewavs.cgi?Bandits=danger.wav
700 dead
« Reply #31 on: March 31, 2004, 02:56:53 PM »
maybe he was more than willing.  but we have found no proof that he was doing it.  (not 'had ever'  but was doing at the time we invaded)

you can go as far back as you like in Osamas past, back to where he recieved help from us.  (seems like it was the early 80's when we called him a freedom fighter.  but then he confined his terroist activities agains the ussr.  thats the difference between a terrorist and afreedom fighter, right? whos side they are on.)

we've sold WMD, as well as conventional arms, we've trained terrorists, that's not the issue.  

the issue is was he complying at the time of invasion, and since it was a UN directive that he was required to comply with, did the UN ask us to invade?
Logged

Offline mosgood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
700 dead
« Reply #32 on: March 31, 2004, 02:57:05 PM »
Hey Bohdi!!  How ya been bud?
Logged

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
700 dead
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2004, 03:21:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by capt. apathy
really, the key year is missing.

where is the 2003 info?

what the chart doesn't show is that in all probability, the deaths from other causes either stayed the same or increased.  on top of the aditional 700 deaths.

the Iraqi combat deaths are in adition too, not instead of.


I couldn't find 2003. Anyone else have any luck?

Your assumption may well be incorrect. In my years in the Air Force, accidental deaths went down in years of conflict. It almost seemed that when real danger was present, folks were more careful. I believe this was documented study I read while I was in.

So you may be right, but you might be wrong as well. I don't think you can make that generalization as yet. Be nice if someone could find 2003 data.
Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline LAWCobra

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 664
      • http://www.lawsquadron.cjb.net
700 dead
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2004, 03:23:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bodhi
Not nearly so dumb as you...

quit wasting your parents money and study....



:rolleyes:


LOL sig material
Logged

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
700 dead
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2004, 03:23:49 PM »
Still looking, found this, still not conclusive either way but it may indicate that people AREN'T more careful in wartime. Seems accidental deaths are up as well as hostile deaths.

Despite war's end, military deaths a growing concern

Quote
At current rates, in fiscal 2003 Marines are having their worst year for serious on-duty accidents in 11 years, and the Navy in five years, according to official safety statistics. Meanwhile, the Army's number of serious on-duty ground accidents - as well as resulting fatalities - have more than doubled so far this fiscal year.

Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline capt. apathy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4240
      • http://www.moviewavs.com/cgi-bin/moviewavs.cgi?Bandits=danger.wav
700 dead
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2004, 03:37:08 PM »
btw- toad,  I forgot to mention, thanks for the info you did find.  the chart did provide some useful info.  on re-reading my "where's 2003", post I kinda came off sounding like the info was useless since we didn't have the 2003.  didn't mean it that way, just that we needed more pieces.
Logged

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
700 dead
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2004, 03:57:24 PM »
That's a normal DOD site. I expect they just haven't compiled/posted 2003 as yet.

No offense taken. I don't view you as one of the board's bungholes. ;)

I just don't agree with you sometimes. Generally, you're a poster worth reading that does so without the ad hominem stuff.

Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9915
700 dead
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2004, 04:25:39 PM »
So uhh how does the death/100000 rate compare with the murder rate/100000 in Washington or New York? Just outta curiousity :)
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
700 dead
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2004, 04:47:38 PM »
Quote
Pongo, were you aware that a Canadian civilian was killed by a crazed mob in Iraq this past week? Im just curious if canadian news reported it.

Ya  He was from here. An ex royal marine now living in Victoria. Working as a Merc for 1000 US per day. He left a beutifle wife and 3 very young kids behind.
There are over 14000 mercs in Iraq right now apperently.
Logged

Offline LAWCobra

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 664
      • http://www.lawsquadron.cjb.net
700 dead
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2004, 04:49:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
Ya  He was from here. An ex royal marine now living in Victoria. Working as a Merc for 1000 US per day. He left a beutifle wife and 3 very young kids behind.
There are over 14000 mercs in Iraq right now apperently.


Seems like a selfish occupation for a dude with kids.
Logged

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
700 dead
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2004, 05:12:09 PM »
$1000 per day is pretty good change. I wonder how much a Marine lance corporal makes per day?
Logged

Offline stiehl

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 329
700 dead
« Reply #42 on: March 31, 2004, 06:03:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
$1000 per day is pretty good change. I wonder how much a Marine lance corporal makes per day?


Bro says $40
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
700 dead
« Reply #43 on: March 31, 2004, 06:59:58 PM »
Your haliburton dollars at work.
Logged

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
700 dead
« Reply #44 on: March 31, 2004, 07:08:37 PM »
Can you explain to me exactly how Haliburton figures into the war with Iraq. I understand the Cheney connection, but there's got to be more to it than that.

Exactly how much has Haliburton profited from the war with Iraq and how has this helped George W. Bush wither politically or financially.

I know the lefties just love to say this one word when they don't know what else to say, but I'm guessing most don't even know what the connection is.

And please don't link me to a "Tower 7" websight. Thanks.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »