Author Topic: Aircraft by nationality-Visibility  (Read 275 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« on: May 31, 2001, 09:59:00 AM »
JAPAN
A6M5b
Ki-61-I-KAIc
N1K2-J
TOTALS:3
0  BOMBERS

GERMANY
Ar 234B
Bf 109F-4
Bf 109G-10
Bf 109G-2
Bf 109G-6
Fw 190A-5
Fw 190A-8
Fw 190D-9
Fw 190F-8
Ju 88A-4
Ta 152H
Ostwind
Panzer IV Type H
TOTALS: 13
2 BOMBERS  

UNITED STATES  
B-17G
B-26B
F4U-1C
F4U-1D
F6F-5    
C-47A
P-38L
P-47D-11
P-47D-25
P-47D-30
P-51B
P51D Mustang
TBM-3
LVT(A)2
LVT(A)4
M-3
M-16
Elco 80' PT Boat
TOTALS: 18
2 BOMBERS    

ITALY
C.202
C.205
TOTALS: 2
0 BOMBERS

RUSSIA
Il-2 Type 3    
La-5FN
La-7
Yak-9T
Yak-9U
TOTALS:5
1 BOMBER

UNITED KINGDOM
Lancaster III
Seafire IIC
Spitfire MkIX
Spitfire V
Tempest V
Typhoon
TOTALS: 6
1 BOMBER

Its my opinion we need more bombers!
     
 
     
     



[This message has been edited by Ripsnort (edited 05-31-2001).]

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2001, 10:04:00 AM »
Dammit, thought I was in Aircraft forum, my apologies...

Pyro: move this if you will, please.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2001, 03:00:00 PM »
Punt! (Note: lack of bombers, early war stuff!, and no P61 Black Widow!)

Offline DRILL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 345
      • http://www.457thbgh.com
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2001, 03:09:00 PM »
 yep need more bomders and the p61  

------------------
DRILL
Drill /384th FA/CH 364th

Offline MadBirdCZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
      • http://home.worldonline.cz/~cz088436/
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2001, 03:27:00 PM »
P61 has my vote from the very begining   Gimme that black ugly plane! I love it! And about the bombers? Golly-geened Right!!!

------------------
MBirdCZ
CO of Sudden Death Squadron

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2001, 04:14:00 PM »
Agreed, esp Japanese bombers, flying boats, etc.

Also more Italian, russian, & Japanese fighters.

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2001, 07:06:00 PM »
Good grief yes, we need more Japanese planes.

Ki61 is very nice, but the Japanese also  need naval bombers, level bombers, the Ki84, and the Emily.

Not much point in a PTO HA without more IJ aircraft.

Offline Dangerous Game

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2001, 07:25:00 PM »
Thanks Rip  

 

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2001, 07:44:00 AM »
P-P-Punt!

Offline kfsone

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
      • http://www.kfs.org/~oliver
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2001, 08:05:00 AM »
We need a broader distribution of aircraft across all countries period, but I think HTC are already on that anyway  

We just got a new 'bomber' (the IL2), so I think it's unfair to beat on them for this right now =)

I have to admit curiosity to knowing what sort of schedule they've got on adding aircraft, not on the nitty-gritty detail but, say, do they intend to add early-war aircraft yet, or do they plan to pad the aircraft backwards and build up to a situation that enables a variety of HA scenarios.

Personally I'd love to see lots of early-war aircraft being added in and later-war aircraft having perk value placed on them.

He111, Ju87, Blenheim, Wellington or Shackleton. Some more tanks, the Betty, the Hurricane... You can't add the Mosquito without adding the Me110 and the fighter-version of the Ju88.

=)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2001, 08:13:00 AM »
No "beatings" here KF, just as the title says..."Visibility".  

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2001, 08:16:00 AM »
Canada
Goose Egg

Ok, so we had none.  

The Spitfire XIV would be the closest thing, though.

Throw us Canucks a bone here!

Offline Westy MOL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 902
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2001, 08:26:00 AM »
 In a very recent interview with Pyro:
 http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/interviews/aceshigh/pyro/

 To be blunt, what other kinds of aircraft do you anticipate adding (a Stuka maybe?).

 The Stuka is something we’ll definitely do. Our goal is to do all the planes you would expect and quite a few that you wouldn’t.


 and

Where do you see Aces High in one year? ...

 In another year, the game will be fairly matured. We should have the whole war covered in terms of planes with just individual holes left to fill.



 It's going to be a fun and exciting year imo.

 -Westy



[This message has been edited by Westy MOL (edited 06-01-2001).]

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Aircraft by nationality-Visibility
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2001, 08:19:00 AM »
oops! How'd this get back up here? Subliminal?