A question about WMDs in Iraq...

[muckmaw]

This seems to be the rally cry of the liberals, and the main problem the Bush admin is facing in the reelection bid.

Here's my question:

If Bush is the liar all the liberals say he is, and he isfacing this huge credibility gap because of the loack of WMDs found in Iraq, why does'nt he have WMD's planted in Iraq?

According to the lefties I read, all of Iraq's WMD's came from the US anyway. Is it that easy to trace a few 55 gal drums of (Insert Chemical/Bio of your choice here)

This is not bait. I'm just confused as to why the "Liar Bush" as he is called just does'nt tell one more lie if he's so crooked.

[Yeager]

Bush lied?  nah.....he may have fibbed a bit but he didnt lie.  liberals may try to use mindtricks and deceive the common people.  My advice, everything a liberal says should be considered trixxie.

[Saurdaukar]

Originally posted by muckmaw
why does'nt he have WMD's planted in Iraq?

That will be the next rally cry if we ever find any.

You cant convince a Bush hater, dont even try.

[muckmaw]

But my question is, if he's such a liar, why does'nt he do it?

He'll gain credibility with fence sitters.

I mean, this is the guy that created a freakin' war to make Haliburton rich...you're telling me they can't come up with a scheme for this?

[Westy]

"This is not bait."

 rofl.  That's a good one.




 oh.  Just saw this on Foxnews and CNN

[Saurdaukar]

Another awesome contribution by Westy.  Youre on a roll today, son.

[muckmaw]

So whats the answer. Don't be a tool.

I'm trying to learn something here.

Is the answer, 'Well, WMDs can be traced by their molecular blahbityblah" or "All WMDS have serial numbers"

I'm jsut looking for an honest answer.

[Westy]

And what's wrong with answering a trolling question with a little humor?  er, son?

[Saurdaukar]

Originally posted by muckmaw

I'm jsut looking for an honest answer.

ROFL!!  Now THATS a good one.  

[muckmaw]

Originally posted by Westy
And what's wrong with answering a trolling question with a little humor?  er, son?

That was humor?

Look, you don't know me. I think we can establish that, so please don't judge my intent as you have no basis for this judgement.

Now, instead of turning this into a "Who gets the last word" jerk-fest, can you or someone else just answer my question so we can all get on with our lives?

[Horn]

Originally posted by muckmaw

Look, you don't know me. I think we can establish that, so please don't judge my intent as you have no basis for this judgement.
 

Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck. Or troll.

Perhaps next time you could use the "lefties" and "liberal" tags a little less and you'd get a bite. I'd give it a 2. And a weak one at that.

h

[Westy]

lol.  I may not know you but I can see you're a clown.  

 But ok. I have about 30 more minutes today so let's play "ask a really silly, LOADED question."


"This is not bait. I'm just confused as to why the "Liar Bush" as he is called just does'nt tell one more lie if he's so crooked."

 
  Who says he won't? There's lots of time left between now and November.

[muckmaw]

But that's my question.

Why does'nt he. I'm not condoning it in any way.

The best, clearest non-partisan way to ask this question is:

Is it easy, difficult or impossible to trace the source of a WMD?

If it's easy, the answer to why Bush has not planted is obvious.

If it's impossible, I can't understand why he has'nt planted them to save his re-election bid. (Assuming that he is a liar).

That's what I am trying to figure out here.

[capt. apathy]

Originally posted by muckmaw
Here's my question:

If Bush is the liar all the liberals say he is, and he isfacing this huge credibility gap because of the loack of WMDs found in Iraq, why does'nt he have WMD's planted in Iraq?

According to the lefties I read, all of Iraq's WMD's came from the US anyway. Is it that easy to trace a few 55 gal drums of (Insert Chemical/Bio of your choice here)

This is not bait. I'm just confused as to why the "Liar Bush" as he is called just doesn't tell one more lie if he's so crooked.

he probably will, but not until it gets a little closer to the election.  if he finds them now he could screw up in the meantime and blow the re-election.

they'll be 'found'  sometime around early October most likely, so he can ride that little wave of victory into the election.

at least thats what I'd expect him to do.

[Eagler]

we could have discovered everything and there would still be many who cried we should never have invaded ..

they were crying before we left not knowing what we'd find, happy to leave saddam in power, waiting for the next attack so they could cry/blame some more

LANDSLIDE BUSH!