Author Topic: okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.  (Read 797 times)

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
You must do it same planes, enemy and friendly. this is incase you collide you die. so you need 3 people or do it in da.






 now this a real photo not touched up of the thunderbirds[/IMG]

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2004, 09:13:20 AM »
even the slightest interference in the netroute..
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2004, 09:26:18 AM »
Rod, don't believe for a minute that those 2 F-16s are the same distance from the camera.

It's a great photo, though. :)

[edit: Question... did they paint the "5" on upside-down (on the side of intake) on the top aircraft?]
« Last Edit: April 19, 2004, 09:29:35 AM by Dux »
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline deknuf

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2004, 11:33:28 AM »
Photochop

Offline 214thCavalier

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2004, 11:46:12 AM »
Not necessarily a photochop.
Red arrows make an art of it, smoke and mirrors stuff.

As Dux mentioned they actually have lateral separation but when viewed from the side especially at low level you do not percieve it and accept the image at face value.

Top aircraft is closer to the camera in this instance.

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2004, 11:50:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by deknuf
Photochop


pfft, um no.


LOL Rod!

Do you have some shots head on of same shot? Are those stabs touching? lol... Nah cant be.

I'll try this tonight... It will be very easy i think with a 262 because you can trim it out to fly perfectly lvl upside down. Tho with collisions on it could be interesting.

Stuff like this always breaks up the monotony a bit... I like it;)
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Spitter

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 136
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2004, 12:12:34 PM »
And to answer Dux, IIRC, the number 5 plane does have the number painted upside down.  At least on one side of the inlet.
I'll dig through my photo albums and see if I can find a pic of #5 on the ground/flying level.

[Edit: I found this pic online.  You can clearly see the upside down 5]

There are some great pics on that site.  Looks like the 5 on the other side is right side up... :cool:
Cheers,
Spitter
« Last Edit: April 19, 2004, 12:20:32 PM by Spitter »

Offline Gwjr2

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 795
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2004, 01:00:12 PM »
#5 is the lead solo plane that spends most of the time inverted hence the upside dwn 5 :D

« Last Edit: April 19, 2004, 01:12:31 PM by Gwjr2 »
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same.

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
okay morpheus do this with planes. lets see who can do it first.
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2004, 01:49:36 PM »
wow some of you know the thunderbirds well. there is 5 to 8ft is my guess max seperation. I'll go thru entire airshow from vegas see if there is a headon view. Have a great photo of them over Grandcayon i;ll post it its my backround.




 and hes right about 5 its painted upside down both sides. for exact reason stated