Originally posted by Ripsnort
Its too bad that past admininstration didn't act on intelligence offered, we may not have had 9/11 and Bush wouldn't have gone off on a WMD fiasco..(read page two, about Bin Laden)
I don't know what your source is, looks like Newsmax to me. Here's another account of that particular incident that doesn't make the news on sites like Newsmax...
Saudis Balked at Accepting U.S. Plan
WASHINGTON The government of Sudan, using a back channel direct from its president to the Central Intelligence Agency in the United States, offered in the early spring of 1996 to arrest Osama bin Laden and place him in custody in Saudi Arabia, according to officials and former officials in all three countries.
The Clinton administration struggled to find a way to accept the offer in secret contacts that stretched from a meeting at hotel in Arlington, Virginia, on March 3, 1996, to a fax that closed the door on the effort 10 weeks later.
Unable to persuade the Saudis to accept Mr. bin Laden, and lacking a case to indict him in U.S. courts, the Clinton administration finally gave up on the capture…
So, once again it seems that the Saudi's have had a hand in American politics, this time by not being willing to act in our best interest.
This combined with a hostile legislative branch that surely didn't help BC's efforts against terrorism and what you get is more partisan politcal BS that serves no purpose whatsoever.