Author Topic: Next plane need for aceshigh b29  (Read 553 times)

Offline seankill

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« on: April 21, 2004, 04:33:26 PM »
b29

Offline Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7983
Re: Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2004, 04:37:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by seankill
b29


i wouldn't mind having the b-29 on one condition...

bombbay doors and machine guns have a timer... they can't be opened/fired until plane has been wheels up for 8 hours.

and perked at 500 points.

and random engine fires.

:D
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Turbo11

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2004, 04:39:00 PM »
That's stupid. :mad:

Offline seankill

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
very
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2004, 04:44:39 PM »
What stupid dummy would do that you don't have to have a a. bomb

Offline Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7983
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2004, 05:13:42 PM »
what's really stupid is your inability to understand the size and design of the AH maps in relation to what a b-29 was designed for.

fly a b-17 and pretend ur in a b-29.
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2004, 05:15:41 PM »
look up "Battle of Kansas".....
nuff said

Offline seankill

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
whatever
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2004, 06:00:41 PM »
whatever

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
idiot
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2004, 06:01:57 PM »
you are.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2004, 09:41:23 PM »
Bombers I would like to see BEFORE B29....
B24
b25
PBY
HE-111
JU-52
GM3

Offline Turbo11

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2004, 10:06:23 PM »
That's Ok.

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2004, 10:38:59 PM »
G4m and he111 should be on top of that list.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2004, 10:44:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B17Skull12
G4m and he111 should be on top of that list.

oh yes, please weaken the Japanese and Germans in scenarios and CT setups.

Please please please.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2004, 10:10:19 AM »
how about VVS package like the Pe-2, Il-4, I-16, MiG-3, LaGG-3, Yak9M, and last but not least......... The venerable Yak-3!:)

I'm predicting that we will have these package in 2007...

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2004, 05:31:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B17Skull12
G4m and he111 should be on top of that list.
I have to agree :D
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Next plane need for aceshigh b29
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2004, 09:05:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rafe35
I have to agree :D

Why?

Without adding the comparable Allied designs (Wellington Mk III, B-25B or C) it simply cripples the Axis in scenarios while leaving the Allies with the same stuff.  It is the same as having a 1937 D3A1 and a 1938 B5N2 lined up against a 1943 SBD-5 and 1943 TBM-3.  They get used in scenarios and the Allies get their stuff in scenarios.  The end result is that in early war setups the Allies are using stuff that is better than what they had and the Axis is using the correct stuff, or the Allies are using the correct stuff and the Axis are trying to get results out of equipment that had been retired in reality.

Adding more early war Axis stuff without adding the appropriate opposition forces exacerbates an imbalance that already exists.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-