« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Cold War - Hot War  (Read 935 times)

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Cold War - Hot War
« on: May 14, 2004, 09:35:26 AM »
What do you think about this.

WW2 had just finished. However pervious partners USA, UK and USSR entered new stage cold war..............

1946 - Deplomatic relations between USSR and USA are broken. At the theritory of Europ that had suffered for long years of German Occupation new conflict begins................

USAF and RAF
  • P-51D
  • P-47D-30
  • P-38L
  • Spitfire Mk XIV
  • Tempest
  • B-17G
  • Lancaster
  • B-26
  • C-47
  • Ms, Panzer, Tiger (limited)

VVS
  • La-7
  • La-5FN
  • Yak-9U
  • Yak-9T
  • Il-2 Type III
  • Boston
  • A-20
  • C-47
  • Ms, Pnazer, Tiger (limited)


.........................

I think it would be quite interesting to see how VVS and USAF/RAF.

What do you think
Logged
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline wombat

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2004, 10:23:39 AM »
Nice idea, what map were you thinking of using?

I think the KI-67 (stand in for the Petlyakov 2) would work better than Bostons...just my $0.02 worth.
Logged

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2004, 12:16:41 PM »
Heheh .... Artik, my friend .... some here will hate you. :D
Logged

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2004, 12:22:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
Heheh .... Artik, my friend .... some here will hate you. :D


:lol you right buddy
Logged
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

storch

  • Guest
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2004, 01:16:55 PM »
That would be a fun set up but some people would howl.
Logged

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2004, 01:50:52 PM »
Too bad there's no F4U Corsair   :(
Logged
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2004, 02:44:34 PM »
You could even add a very limited number of jets and rocket planes, representing the technology captured and exploited by both sides.  Too bad we don't have a B-29.  Imagine B-29s trying to fight there way through Me262's on the way to Moscow?
Logged
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2004, 03:42:44 PM »
Post war fantasy... I hate it.

Sorry, but I do.

eskimo
Logged

Offline TheBug

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5652
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2004, 06:12:12 PM »
Hate it, but I'm pretty sure it will be up and running in two weeks.
Logged
“It's a big ocean, you don't have to find the enemy if you don't want to."
  -Richard O'Kane

Offline Dogsta04

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
      • http://http://www.geocities.com/no800sqdn/index.html
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2004, 06:30:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TheBug
Hate it, but I'm pretty sure it will be up and running in two weeks.


we can hope! :)
Logged

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12795
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2004, 08:54:32 PM »
Hate it, but I'm pretty sure it will be up and running in two weeks.


Why dont you cry about something Storch?
Logged

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2004, 02:31:43 AM »
did yall notice that USAF and RAF have more fighters and more bombers then the VVS and all of them are better then the VVS planes (take out the tempest and the b17/lanc then it would be a nice setup) if ur ganna make a setup atlest make it even. il-2 dont count as one of the bombers cuz IL-2 is a tank killin bomber same with the a20. b17 lanc and b26s are the best bombers in the game yall dont need all three.
Logged

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2004, 02:37:12 AM »
Yes maybe.......

actually the strategic bomber aviation wasn't developed in USSR in the peroid on WW2.

But for game reasons bombers can be limited someway........
And yes some of planes (Tempest) can be limited........
Logged
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12795
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2004, 03:57:51 AM »
did yall notice that USAF and RAF have more fighters and more bombers then the VVS and all of them are better then the VVS planes



The VVS need a better bomber for sure. Subbing the Ki-67 for the Pe-2 is a good idea and there is a nice skin for it. The La-7 and Yak-9U will match up to U.S. iron just fine for dogfighting. Maybe skin a P-47D25 for the Ruskies too. The Boston will be slaughtered.
Logged

storch

  • Guest
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2004, 04:57:03 AM »
By this time period the clever and resourceful soviets had copied (down to the last rivet) the B29.  hailing themselves as technologically superior to the west they fielded the great Tu-4.

The great Yak-3 was also available as well.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »