Originally posted by Fishu:
Ahh.. again these statistic blahblahs..
These statistics dont tell the truth 
AkDejaVu;
Relax Bud! Follow Fishu's advice.
I have been looking alot at the stats and comparing them. I sometimes post my results. I have been doing this since beta.
Did you actually take a close look at the stats I posted or just read
F4U-1C and then decide to flame me?
The only reason I commented on the F4U-1C, because it
has always came out on top. Why don't you get off your infantile spasodic knee jerk tantrum reaction and check the stats intellegently. I posted stats on every single fighter A/C. I did not single any out.
I pretty much clarified my postion saying that these stats are only reflective and relative. I left it open for the reader to make their own conclusion.
My fantasy number (CSN) is my approach at simplying this process for the reader.
I have several tours in my data base. How would you like it to be examined? My comment about the F4U-1C is honest. It rocks. It does well often when other A/C are dismal. My comment about the Ostwind was equally honest. It is doing really well also.
Everytime time I post up some stats, someone always tells me "Stats are worthless". This is wrong and and it is also right. Let me give you an example of wrong:
- First I give you $1,000
- I give 1 of 2 choices for gambling methods
1 - The P-38L method
2 - The P-51D method
Say you choose the P-38L method "because you like it" I choose the P-51D method "because I analysed the stats". After 40,000 or so rounds of gambling I have $1,200 you have $700.
Duh!
------------------
Mino
The Wrecking Crew
"Anyway, more golf..."
Humble
