Author Topic: Very strange  (Read 623 times)

Offline SCDR

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Very strange
« on: May 22, 2004, 04:23:16 PM »
I have seen alot of stuff in AH that falls in the "Wow that was strange!" catagory, but today topped it.

I was in a tiger and a 38 came in lo and hit me with JUST 2 rockets and I died. Not only was that BS it was strange.

I sure hope this doesn't happen in AH2.

SCDR
« Last Edit: May 23, 2004, 10:17:37 PM by SCDR »

Offline Innominate

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
Very strange
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2004, 07:49:55 PM »
There's more to tanks than damagepoints and hitpoints.

A tank is strong.  But a tank is brittle.  It takes a good hit to kill a tank, a hit that doesn't kill it will likely do little damage.  It only takes one good hit to kill a tank, and that one good hit will often destroy it completly.

It's also worth noting that the absolute weakest point of a tanks armor is the top.

Nothing strange.

(Note, rant into general complaints about GV model follows, as well as some monstrously bad paintbrush drawing)

This is what a tanks armor looks like(The thick part is the front) Drawn are hypothetical shots.  The blue lines are shots which do no damage, the red lines are shots which in this case would be able to penetrate the armor.  Note the relative thickness of the armor.  Also note that the 'diagonal' shots have to pass through more armor in order to penetrate, the farther from 90 degrees that the shot hits at, the more armor it has to penetrate.




Now lets consider a couple cases of 1v1 tank duels.  
On the left, we have one tank parked facing the rear of the other tank.  This is a common case where you get such unbalances as hitting an identical tank 10 times, and then dying to the first shot.  The tank on top has a huge advantage over the tank on the bottom who's weakest part is exposed.

In the next two we have the top tank at a 45 degree angle to the bottom tank.  The bottom tank has nothing but his front armor exposed, while the top tank has both front and side armor exposed.  The top tank's front armor may now be at a high enough angle that you have no chance of getting through it.  So you'll need to aim for the weaker side armor.



Some of this is generalizations, some may be flat out wrong.  Not intended for actual military use. Etc.

While the GV model isnt perfect, and has some real problems.  The vast majority of tank complaints stem from a lack of understanding of armored warfare.

Two more points,
Tanks will ALWAYS turn to face thier enemy(when possible) in order to get thier strongest armor protecting them.  In the same line of reasoning, a tank will always retreat in reverse, so as to avoid exposing thier weak rear armor.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2004, 08:28:56 PM by Innominate »

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Re: Very strange
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2004, 04:34:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SCDR
I have seen alot of stuff in AH that falls in the "Wow that was strange!" catagory, but today topped it.

I was in a tiger and a 38 came in lo and hit me with JUST 2 rockets and I died. Not only was that BS it was strange.

I sure hope this doesn't happen in AH2.

SCDR

I was in an il2 the other day and my rockets bounced off a tiger and nearly hit me!

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Very strange
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2004, 11:49:20 AM »
I have killed tigers with a single rocket from a tiffy.  Very low angle and from the side.  I have no idea if they had been damaged before or not.
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline Pooh21

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3145
Re: Re: Very strange
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2004, 12:10:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BenDover
I was in an il2 the other day and my rockets bounced off a tiger and nearly hit me!



My Dad was riding as an Observer in an OV-10, pilot went in to blow a barge out of the water with rockets, he said they bounced off and he saw them go over te canopy.
Bis endlich der Fiend am Boden liegt.
Bis Bishland bis Bishland bis Bishland wird besiegt!

Offline Dextry

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
Very strange
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2004, 10:25:00 PM »
You think thats strange........I've droped a 1800kg bomb DIRECTLY on top of a tiger....looked at my radio and had no kill sign??? I looked back at the tiger and he was sitting in the crater smoking but still alive??? explain that crap:mad:

Offline digaling

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Very strange
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2004, 02:53:14 AM »
You missed.

Offline rogerdee

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
      • http://rogerdee.co.uk
attacking tanks
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2004, 11:12:35 AM »
i  read  once  some wear  that  tiffys used  to ain  so  the  bullets  hit  the  belly  of the tank    by    bounice  off the  ground  just  in  front?  proberly  wrong
490th battling bulldogs
www.rogerdee.co.uk

it does what it says on the tin

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Re: attacking tanks
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2004, 02:40:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rogerdee
i  read  once  some wear  that  tiffys used  to ain  so  the  bullets  hit  the  belly  of the tank    by    bounice  off the  ground  just  in  front?  proberly  wrong


i heard that this was a common strategy.  never thought of it as exclusive among Typhoon pilots.

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Very strange
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2004, 12:56:31 PM »
There are different types of rockets in AH right? Some seemed like their designed for tank busting, others for buildings, etc.

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Re: attacking tanks
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2004, 07:08:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by rogerdee
i  read  once  some wear  that  tiffys used  to ain  so  the  bullets  hit  the  belly  of the tank    by    bounice  off the  ground  just  in  front?  proberly  wrong

I heard it was more from p47 pilots


Anyway, its been disregarded as complete BS here multiple times.

Do you want to know more?
*Points at search button*