Author Topic: Jug D-40?  (Read 454 times)

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Jug D-40?
« on: June 04, 2004, 02:35:41 PM »
The Jug "D-40" is actually a typo, right?  Or, did HTC actually change the modelling of the D-30 in AH2?


Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
Jug D-40?
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2004, 02:38:30 PM »
Pyro said it was always a d40 but mis-named in AH1.

Its now corrected for AH2.....

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Jug D-40?
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2004, 02:39:26 PM »
Ah!  Okay, thanks Batz.

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
Jug D-40?
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2004, 03:20:18 PM »
Someone in AH2 noted last night that they were getting more MP from the "new" Jug.

Any truth to that?

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Jug D-40?
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2004, 03:24:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert MOL
Someone in AH2 noted last night that they were getting more MP from the "new" Jug.

Any truth to that?


MP?  

Miles per...?
Manual Pumping...?
Methanol something...?

Offline jodgi

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 696
      • http://forum.mercair.net
Jug D-40?
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2004, 03:55:55 PM »
Manifold pressure.

(or.... is that a hook caught in my mouth?)

Offline TBolt A-10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1142
      • http://www.picturehangar.com
Jug D-40?
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2004, 04:05:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by jodgi
Manifold pressure.

(or.... is that a hook caught in my mouth?)


No, i'm just brain-dead today.  Besides, if I bait anymore hooks, Skuzzy will ban me again.  (sigh)

If the Jug has more power, I'm happy.  I always thought it felt  underpowered -- judging by Robert Johnson's unbiased *snicker* descriptions of his "D-model."

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
Jug D-40?
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2004, 06:45:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TBolt A-10
No, i'm just brain-dead today.  Besides, if I bait anymore hooks, Skuzzy will ban me again.  (sigh)

If the Jug has more power, I'm happy.  I always thought it felt  underpowered -- judging by Robert Johnson's unbiased *snicker* descriptions of his "D-model."

No hook, no bait, not my "style". Yes they meant manifold pressure too :D

I heard somewhere (I cannot substantiate either way) that the AH P47 does not have the paddle-bladed prop modeled, it has the more comon version of the 4-blade, like the one used on the Mustang.

Any truth to that?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Jug D-40?
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2004, 07:24:13 PM »
D-11 lacks the paddle bladed prop.  I'm pretty sure the D-25 and D-40 have it though.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
Jug D-40?
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2004, 07:31:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert MOL
No hook, no bait, not my "style". Yes they meant manifold pressure too :D

I heard somewhere (I cannot substantiate either way) that the AH P47 does not have the paddle-bladed prop modeled, it has the more comon version of the 4-blade, like the one used on the Mustang.

Any truth to that?


The Paddle blade was better for high altitude, but for low alt missions, the tooth pick was better and some crew chiefs reverted the to tooth pick at the end of the war, where their pilot was mainly going jabo. (Where the heck did I read that?):confused:
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------