« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9   Go Down

Author Topic: Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?  (Read 3120 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #105 on: June 10, 2004, 09:58:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SLO
at least I don't bore people with my useless 1 sided blabbering like you :D


But of course you do!

BTW, if that little hissy fit was meant for me, it's obvious you don't know merde about international aviation.

Put "ICAO" in Google. It would be a start on lifting the veil of darkness.

Ta.
Logged
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #106 on: June 11, 2004, 04:37:57 AM »


Lech Walesa says he owes Reagan a "debt of gratitude" for what he did for the Polish people.
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline StabbyTheIcePic

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 566
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #107 on: June 11, 2004, 09:21:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
bet klinton could have made sure the soviet union hung on for a decade or two more tho.... would he be responsible for it not falling or just there?

oh... and you being a  liberal I would not expect yu to take responsibility for anything.

lazs


Most economists believe reagan only speed up the soviet demise by about 3-5 years. Their collapse is not because of reagan, but because communisim just does not work. When the soviet economy fell apart in the mid 70's it was only a matter of time.

I will thank reagan for signing  treaties with russia in order to stop the nuclear arms race.
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13614
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #108 on: June 11, 2004, 09:30:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Most economists believe reagan only speed up the soviet demise by about 3-5 years. Their collapse is not because of reagan, but because communisim just does not work. When the soviet economy fell apart in the mid 70's it was only a matter of time.

I will thank reagan for signing  treaties with russia in order to stop the nuclear arms race.


Some say the Japanese would have surrendered without the use of the atomic bomb. Maybe, but who knows how many more would have died if not for the decisive action of Truman. The same may be said about Reagan. Who knows what might have happened had not Reagan shown the strength, determination, and resolve to stand against encroaching communism?
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #109 on: June 11, 2004, 10:54:05 AM »
well.... if Regan "only" speeded up the fall of the soviet union by 3-4 years as "most econimists" say... then if klinton ccould have prolonged it for 7-8... we woulda had a decade or so more of cold war under klinton... seems we owe Regan a lot.  Way things were going... I don't think the world would survive another decade of sword rattling.

lazs
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13614
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #110 on: June 11, 2004, 12:23:10 PM »
Well, my fears were unfounded. Bush's eulogy, while not half so moving as that of Thatcher, wasn't bad at all.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #111 on: June 11, 2004, 12:57:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
Shadenfreude, I am curious, are funerals in your country by invitation only? Have you never been to one?


yup they are for invited only in our country.
Famiy members doesnt need invitation, all other should have


Since there is some tension between US and Fr, it would be nice to send invitation.
Logged

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #112 on: June 11, 2004, 12:58:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
Stop hijacking threads!!



yeah watch him, he si bloody terrorist hijacking almost everything....


:D

edit.: you better go check your daughters case if he is not hidding there
Logged

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #113 on: June 11, 2004, 01:03:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
Some say the Japanese would have surrendered without the use of the atomic bomb. Maybe, but who knows how many more would have died if not for the decisive action of Truman.


yeah and second AB were just for case... sure sure ...

there is no better way, how to show rest of amy, that war is over that throw AB on big cities full of people.....


bomb some military targets would not be so clear for rest of army i guess


Im wondering who chosen targets for AB.
Logged

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #114 on: June 11, 2004, 01:05:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
well.... if Regan "only" speeded up the fall of the soviet union by 3-4 years as "most econimists" say... then if klinton ccould have prolonged it for 7-8... we woulda had a decade or so more of cold war under klinton... seems we owe Regan a lot.  Way things were going... I don't think the world would survive another decade of sword rattling.

lazs


You think wrong .... world could survive more 3-4  years w/o any problem
Specialy with secret that Commies are about to fall..

I guess it had to be hard time for military industry, when cold war is over.
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13614
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #115 on: June 11, 2004, 01:07:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lada
yeah and second AB were just for case... sure sure ...

there is no better way, how to show rest of amy, that war is over that throw AB on big cities full of people.....


bomb some military targets would not be so clear for rest of army i guess


Im wondering who chosen targets for AB.


You might ask former Soviets where their multi-megaton warheads were targetted.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #116 on: June 11, 2004, 01:12:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
You might ask former Soviets where their multi-megaton warheads were targetted.


No im not interesting in Soviets..

Im interesting in fact, that military power were show on city full of people   from  ... "DEFEATED" country

Or do you consider your self to have same habbits like a former Russia ?
« Last Edit: June 11, 2004, 01:14:28 PM by lada »
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13614
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #117 on: June 11, 2004, 01:17:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lada
No im not interesting in Soviets..

Im interesting in fact, that military power were show on city full of people as demonstration of power for ... "DEFEATED" army.

Or do you consider your self to have same habbits like a former Russia ?


Defeated? Are we talking about the same Japan? The one that declared they would fight to the last man, woman, and child? The same Japan that did in fact fight so very fiercely in hundreds of engagements throughout the Pacific? The same Japan that didn't surrender even after the first bomb decimated one of their cities? Let's do stick to the "facts" shall we?

Now, about the "fact" of where those Soviet missiles were pointing?
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #118 on: June 11, 2004, 01:47:26 PM »
Osama declared that he have as many young people willing to die for america as Bush have young people willing to live in america......


according to your logic, im wondering that Afghanistant were not Abed as well

chmmmm ...  interesting arguments you have


check time between first, second bomb and capitulation
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13614
Chirac in the US and not going to attend Reagan's funeral?
« Reply #119 on: June 11, 2004, 02:04:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lada
Osama declared that he have as many young people willing to die for america as Bush have young people willing to live in america......


according to your logic, im wondering that Afghanistant were not Abed as well

chmmmm ...  interesting arguments you have


check time between first, second bomb and capitulation


Osama is a blow hard terrorist and never did speak for all of Afghanistan.

Aug 6th, 1945, first bomb. Aug 9th, 1945, second bomb. Aug 10th, 1945, unconditional surrender.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9   Go Up
« previous next »