Author Topic: "9/11 Panel Says Iraq Rebuffed Bin Laden" (Read 2271 times)

Pongo · « **Reply #15 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:10:55 PM »

no here is what I said.
"Bush and co knew there was no evidence of Iraqi WMD. They may well of believed in there heart of hearts that the weapons existed somewhere. But they had no evidence to support the belief."

rpm · « **Reply #16 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:12:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
so now you are saying that they KNEW there were no WMD in iraq before the invasion.....CMON dont make me break out the quotes of every libral in a position of power saying the exact same thing bush did before the war.

Wait... They back the President's war policy and they are good little Americans. But when they find out they were lied to they are "ameerika hatin librals"? They DID scrub you too hard during brainwashing.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #17 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:16:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
Wait... They back the President's war policy and they are good little Americans. But when they find out they were lied to they are "ameerika hatin librals"? They DID scrub you too hard during brainwashing.

WAIT They said the same thing bush did! That was the point. It wasnt just conservative leaders saying Iraq had WMDs So the whole point of Bush an CO knowing there were no weapons to begin with is dumb......try actually reading all the words in the post before responding with a "you're a conservative fascist brainwashed" reply

Gunslinger · « **Reply #18 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:21:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
no here is what I said.
"Bush and co knew there was no evidence of Iraqi WMD. They may well of believed in there heart of hearts that the weapons existed somewhere. But they had no evidence to support the belief."

Prove it. Prove to me that they KNEW there were no weapons.

rpm · « **Reply #19 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:25:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
WAIT They said the same thing bush did! That was the point. It wasnt just conservative leaders saying Iraq had WMDs So the whole point of Bush an CO knowing there were no weapons to begin with is dumb......try actually reading all the words in the post before responding with a "you're a conservative fascist brainwashed" reply

Quote

Originally posted by RPM
Wait... They back the President's war policy and they are good little Americans. But when they find out they were lied to they are "ameerika hatin librals"?

Try actually reading all the words in the post before responding with a "you're a ameerika hatin libral" reply.

rpm · « **Reply #20 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:29:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
Prove it. Prove to me that they KNEW there were no weapons.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1136351,00.html

DoctorYO · « **Reply #21 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:31:48 PM »

Quote

How do you get rebuff from this article? Please copy and paste.

You can read right? I know you speak texican down there but wtf..

It doesn't say I get rebuff, read it again in english (not texican) this time...

to you zombies in texas ("insult the admin, former gov.., We must post a response... types) you sheep need to wise up.. one claims broken link the other claims I get rebuff from posting this.. you fellas are like starving shewolf with 9 starving pups.. desperate is an understatement.. You fellas should test your water for additives..

If you want I can post the transcripts before the Iraq conflict that clearly say Saddam supported(not contacted not rebuffed, not anything else.. he supported were the words) Al Dumbarse... may take a day to dig them up but ill find em.. then what are you clowns going to say.. liberal media.. you only get so many liberal media excuses per day. and youve exhuasted yours already on some other posts.. Not only that at the rate you guys are claiming liberal media there won't be any legit news agencies left in about 3 weeks time, they will all be liberal as per your understanding..

You people are missing the point the problem here is transparency vs lies....

and if you choose lies then don't expect my republican vote.. Thats the issue for the non reading impaired..

This talk of how saddam doesn't support the palistinians or some crap like that I didn't say that.. your trying to either spin or discredit what I really did say.. which is in black and white..

The issue here is lies about Al Dumbarse being supported by Saddam; not terrorism, not is saddam a tyrant?, not wmd... (even though there are lies about some of those things also.)

Nice try.. Sledgehammered again..

DoctorYo

Yeager · « **Reply #22 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:32:37 PM »

Thats not proof, thats not even halfway decent sci-fi

rpm · « **Reply #23 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:36:45 PM »

Don't worry DoctorYO. Some of us Texans drink well water and have not been affected.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #24 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:38:21 PM »

LoL

rpm · « **Reply #25 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:41:14 PM »

Eagler · « **Reply #26 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:42:15 PM »

the "Panel" was a political witch hunt

I take their "findings" with a grain of salt..

Steve · « **Reply #27 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:44:34 PM »

Quote

To all the arse hats saying that Saddam was supporting Al Dumbarses

Quote

Just today, the war criminal Abu al-Zarqawi, an Al Qaeda leader, claimed responsibility for killing the 13 human beings you saw when they died yesterday in Iraq. Zarqawi fled to Iraq after he was wounded in Afghanistan and was given safe harbor and medical treatment by Saddam.

Well then, aren't you special? How do you like your crow?

DoctorYO · « **Reply #28 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:47:02 PM »

steve post the link with the article if your going to quote it..

Thank you..

I would like to read your sources..

DoctorYo

DoctorYO · « **Reply #29 on:** June 16, 2004, 01:52:50 PM »

hell while were at it I bet the 9/11 commission would like to read your sources too.. Becuase now they are lying to the american public if your sources are correct..

Sorry for the machine gun post but your served crow.. any more..

DoctorYo