you could play the same game the other way too.
I believe Ken Lay is a republican, most of those in the savings and loan fiasco a couple decades ago where republicans.
not only where these crooks republicans but had fairly strong ties to the party itself.
this whole thing of trying to paint a whole group with the same brush as some of the members is fairly juvenile.
most of us out grew the idea that you can pigeon hole people by saying "you belong to this group, thats what people in this group think, so I know what you think", and we outgrew it before we got out of elementary school.
you make these elaborate tie-ins, "Kerry's a democrat, so is this guy over here, this guy wants whatever. if you vote for Kerry you'll end up with whatever", it's almost funny but mostly sad and sounds like a really desperate justification, for trying to hold onto belief in a candidate that you're having a hard time convincing your self is worth voting for.
I don't have to make these wild leaps to group people I don't agree with to Bush, in order to find a reason not to vote for him.
Bush himself has shown me enough reason not to vote for him, with a bit of help from his appointees.