Author Topic: Sherman Tank  (Read 3296 times)

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Sherman Tank
« Reply #45 on: June 22, 2004, 10:46:11 AM »
M-18, Sherman, T-34 would be more at home on the current, somewhat cluttered terrain of AH II than the Tiger is.  The M-18 and T-34 especially would prove to be difficult, elusive targets.

Beefing up the tank selection would probably increase business for HTC.  This might also spread out the player numbers on an otherwise crowded map.

Regards, Shuckins/Leggern

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Sherman Tank
« Reply #46 on: June 22, 2004, 11:00:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shuckins
M-18, Sherman, T-34 would be more at home on the current, somewhat cluttered terrain of AH II than the Tiger is.  The M-18 and T-34 especially would prove to be difficult, elusive targets.

Beefing up the tank selection would probably increase business for HTC.  This might also spread out the player numbers on an otherwise crowded map.

Regards, Shuckins/Leggern


I think it's only a matter of time before we get new GVs.  Afterall the new terrain eye candy; trees, roads, bridges, tunnels etc., weren't introduced just for aircraft and to me would point towards the inclusion of more GVs etc.  Hope we see some shortly! :)
NEXX

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Sherman Tank
« Reply #47 on: June 22, 2004, 12:47:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shuckins
M-18, Sherman, T-34 would be more at home on the current, somewhat cluttered terrain of AH II than the Tiger is.  The M-18 and T-34 especially would prove to be difficult, elusive targets.

Beefing up the tank selection would probably increase business for HTC.  This might also spread out the player numbers on an otherwise crowded map.

Regards, Shuckins/Leggern


I've been trying to sing this song to HTC for some time. I honestly believe if they make the game more diverse and immersive they will attrack another segment of players. Lets face it, HTC is in the business to do one thing  {just like any other business} make money!!
I know we'll get some of the flyboys having a fit over the fact there may be more GV's in the game and their argument that AH is a "flight sim" not a GV game {then you need to read the front page of HTC website} "Attack by Land, Sea or Air"
Let's face it, we all spend our $15 a month {not to mention ISP costs} to participate in the game and do what WE the players enjoy. Fly bombers, dogfight in fighters, drive a boat or GV, run supplies, man the guns, whatever. But just as the BBS is filled with "What planes I would like to see" in AH, there should be many more roles to play IMO.
For instance, you have some guys that enjoy resource managment, from troops to supplies to whatever. Other guys like to dive right in and furball in fighters, others like to do GV's and ships.
I just think it's a shame we have umteen million people in the US alone and all we can muster in the game at any one given time is approx 2-300 players:(
We already have a bizillion "fighter" squadrons with a new one croping up each week {which is great} BUT, how bout we have entire GV divisions, bomber groups, CV groups, resource groups, AA battaries, mobile artilary.
Right now as it is, it seems to be either a big furball over a base somewhere, a spawn camping GV battle {between Panzers & Tigers, because there's really no other choices} or bombers {dive bombing at times :rolleyes: } leveling an airfield or GV base.
Maybe all of this is just a waste of time, who knows but I have a feeling if we had a lot more roles for people to play you would start attracking some fresh blood into the game.

My 2 cents

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
emodin
« Reply #48 on: June 22, 2004, 05:52:19 PM »
I do not have any specific books on the t-34.

I have some great ones on the Tiger and Panther from Schiffer.

Pricey but well worth the money.


I have found finding decent books on tanks is fairly hard.

Offline Rasker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1265
Sherman Tank
« Reply #49 on: June 23, 2004, 12:49:07 AM »
what we need are personal weapons, satchel charge, bazooka, submachine gun and option to lead a squad that hops out of an M-3 or off the back of a tank.  Don't need the eye-candy, little stick figures will do, so long as we have the combat mechanics.

Offline Pooh21

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3145
Sherman Tank
« Reply #50 on: June 23, 2004, 06:45:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rasker
what we need are personal weapons, satchel charge, bazooka, submachine gun and option to lead a squad that hops out of an M-3 or off the back of a tank.  Don't need the eye-candy, little stick figures will do, so long as we have the combat mechanics.


oh lordy I'd love to sneak up on an ostwind and hose the crew down with a tommygun.
Bis endlich der Fiend am Boden liegt.
Bis Bishland bis Bishland bis Bishland wird besiegt!

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Sherman Tank
« Reply #51 on: June 23, 2004, 07:06:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2

 The 75mm gun on the Panther has much higher penetration then the one on either the tiger 1 or Panzer 4. The 88mm gun on the Tiger being a shorter barreled then on the later Tiger 2 and Jagpather.


75L70 of Panther and 88L56 of Tiger E were having pretty similar performance; 75L70 had bigger muzzle velocity but 88 had heavier shell.

http://www.kolumbus.fi/staga/scans/pen_germany.gif

Offline many_names

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Sherman Tank
« Reply #52 on: June 23, 2004, 09:12:02 AM »
Hmmm what about some self-propelled artillery and assault guns.  Likes the Sturmmorser Tiger well even tho.... only 18 were produced.....The wespe, StuG III StuH42.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Sherman Tank
« Reply #53 on: June 23, 2004, 10:40:53 AM »
Staga
 Thanks for the chart, good stuff.


 The 75L70 has a decent edge really close but at long range you are right, they are very close.


Interesting.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2004, 11:10:36 AM by GtoRA2 »

Offline memnon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Sherman Tank
« Reply #54 on: June 24, 2004, 02:46:18 PM »
how bout we have entire GV divisions, bomber groups, CV groups, resource groups, AA battaries, mobile artilary.

Would Make AHII the cream of the crop and more realistic for a WWII sim.

Attack by Land, Sea or Air"

See above ^

We need more GV's all around MBT, AA, transports(Studebaker truck.............. with trailer) and above all we need more (GV divisions, bomber groups, CV groups, resource groups, AA battaries, mobile artilary). Once we begin to see more of these types AHII will be a true WWII sim.
:aok

Offline kevykev56

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
Sherman Tank
« Reply #55 on: June 24, 2004, 03:59:32 PM »
Im looking for a BMW R-75 with sidecar. Ten at a time let out the troop from sidecar and take a base :D

RHIN0
RHIN0 Retired C.O. Sick Puppies Squadron

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Sherman Tank
« Reply #56 on: June 24, 2004, 05:02:41 PM »
Now you guys are talkin'  :aok

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Sherman Tank
« Reply #57 on: June 24, 2004, 11:33:24 PM »
AH needs the panther, sherman, and T34


throw in a King tiger and jagdpanther for the bribe HT;)
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Sherman Tank
« Reply #58 on: June 24, 2004, 11:57:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B17Skull12
AH needs the panther, sherman, and T34


throw in a King tiger and jagdpanther for the bribe HT;)


AH doesn't need a Panther, King Tiger or JagdPanther. AH already has a Panzer and Tiger. AH needs some ALLIED ... NON-GERMAN MBTs. The Sherman/Panzer match is a fairly decent one. No need to add every uber-tank Germany developed just yet.

Give the Allies the Shermie and the T-34.

Later possibly a Jumbo Shermie unless there's a Japanese tank modeled in which case the Allied tank to match it should be the Stuart.

Are you following this? :D

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
Sherman Tank
« Reply #59 on: June 25, 2004, 12:39:20 AM »
Arlo seems to be the only reasonable person here:lol