Author Topic: Jug fans.. (Read 1216 times)

simshell · « **Reply #15 on:** June 21, 2004, 02:34:01 PM »

i still i get forced to land because of pilot wound 8 out of 10 times in the jug

im not joking i get more pliot wounds in that plane then anyother plane:rolleyes:

the 109G-6 seems to handle alot better

ghostdancer · « **Reply #16 on:** June 21, 2004, 02:40:25 PM »

Haven't compared the jug in a climb yet. But have head that the P47D40 performs better now .. paddle blade?

As for pilot wounds and front end damage seems to me that I take more oil hits and pilot wounds in the P47D11 than in the P47D40. But could have just been bad luck over last couple of days.

SFRT - Frenchy · « **Reply #17 on:** June 21, 2004, 05:12:34 PM »

I didn't noticed a difference in either performances or gunery. But my Ah1 days are far away now:)

Widewing · « **Reply #18 on:** June 21, 2004, 06:43:51 PM »

I haven't had a chance to really truly explore the AH2 P-47 flight model. I did notice a gain in climb rate (better than 4,000 fpm with 25% fuel from sea level).

I do know that in AH1, configuration was everything. I would fly the P-47D-30 (now the -40) with 50% internal fuel and the belly tank. I would select the 6 gun option and also select the short clip of 267 rounds per gun. Agility was substantially improved, and climb rate was terrific once the drop tank was dumped (about 3,800 fpm at 50% fuel, 3,950 at 25% fuel from sea level).

Therefore, since the P-47D-40 climbs better, it probably accelerates better as well. Adding in improved stall behavior, I suspect that all P-47s are a bit more capable than in AH1.

Note also that if you use auto-climb for climb-out, you will see a substantial increase in climb when you pass 4,000 feet.

My regards,

Widewing

SFRT - Frenchy · « **Reply #19 on:** June 21, 2004, 07:26:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Widewing
I would fly the P-47D-30 (now the -40) with 50% internal fuel and the belly tank. I would select the 6 gun option and also select the short clip of 267 rounds per gun.

I'd rather fly a P51.

Lazer · « **Reply #20 on:** June 21, 2004, 11:00:17 PM »

Pictures damnit

Nilsen · « **Reply #21 on:** June 22, 2004, 02:34:24 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lazer
Pictures damnit

lol yeah.

So.....we have the D40 not and not the 30?. Interesting

bozon · « **Reply #22 on:** June 22, 2004, 04:03:34 AM »

Quote

So.....we have the D40 not and not the 30?. Interesting

no nilsen.
we HAD the D40 and not the D30...

Bozon

Nilsen · « **Reply #23 on:** June 22, 2004, 05:05:56 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by bozon
no nilsen.
we HAD the D40 and not the D30...

Bozon

Aha, so HTC just made a mistake calling it the D30 when it actually had the specs of a D40?