mmmmuuuummmmpph! (hang sprays beer all over the keyboard)
LMAO! I've done my damndest to avoid the BBS "this sim ain't worth it" rants, and continue to at least attempt to remain objective when it comes to pointing out 'oddities' in the sim when I encounter em. I still have some reservations about relative flight models; but suspect I'll be satisfied when the data is published and the sources examined. (hang rolls up sleeves in gleeful anticipation)
BUT! (heheheh) I really wish the guys that ain't got a clue; have no intent to spend the bucks no matter HOW GOOD the sim is (it's MILES better than its competitors already) hop on the open freq or BBS and howl about how 'messed up' it is after 20 minutes of trying to take off. To them I say.. RTFM; and I don't mean "real, true; flight modeling"
Here; on the BBS; I can just ignore 'em.

On line they tend to fracture my patience.
On another similar note; once upon a time, when the country was still young (and the sheep only a little nervous) a dude named Jefferson postulated that a 'vote' was an exercise of the 'franchise'.. in that if yah didn't pay taxes; (own land) then yah had no vote.
Similarly, here; once we go pay; (and I do intend to pay my hard earned money to HTC for the privelges of flyin here and having my gripes addressed) well then... who's the developer gonna listen to then? After the LW planes debacle, I have a REAL sharp eye on this....
Hang
------------------
PALE HORSES
"I looked, and behold; a Pale Horse, and it's riders name was Death, and Hell followed with him" Rev 6.8