Last night's Daily Show?

[AKS\/\/ulfe]

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
For some odd reason, I seriously doubt threatening Saddam's henchmen would result in the desired outcomes

Imagine a golf clap emoticon to match your equally queer rolleyes emoticon.

Now imagine that those three lists of mystical threats I listed were in fact made up to show how three meetings could be three completely different requests/demands for help.

Now imagine that you realised that, and your reply would have never have had to gone from imagined to be put into digital pixels to only prove my statement went a mile over your head.
-SW

[lazs2]

the same people who will tell you that stewart is not a liberal will tell you that the media is not liberal.

lazs

[AKIron]

The fact of the matter according to the panel's report is that there were three meetings. They go on to say that Bin Laden requested training camps. Their conjecture is in stating that apprently Iraq never responded. However, in an earlier paragraph they state that Al Qaeda did in fact have a terroist camp in Iraq. Since they acknowledge the terrorist camp in Iraq how can they conclude that Iraq "apparently" never responded?

[muckmaw]

Guys, let's put the political BS aside here...

Baghdad was for years the official, undisguised home address of Abu Nidal, then the most-wanted gangster in the world, who had been sentenced to death even by the PLO and had blown up airports in Vienna and Rome. Baghdad was the safe house for the man whose "operation" murdered Leon Klinghoffer.

In 1993, a certain Mr. Yasin helped mix the chemicals for the bomb at the World Trade Center and then skipped to Iraq, where he remained a guest of the state until the overthrow of Saddam.

In 2001, Saddam's regime was the only one in the region that openly celebrated the attacks on New York and Washington and described them as just the beginning of a larger revenge.

And it was after, and not before, the 9/11 attacks that Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi moved from Afghanistan to Baghdad and began to plan his now very open and lethal design for a holy and ethnic civil war.

[AKS\/\/ulfe]

I don't know Iron, and I don't pretend to know. I have seen from the track record of our current administration that they aren't firing on all cylinders, which means I can't believe them either. So, I'm forced to question it until the time comes I see strong evidence and not more of this loose almost evidence but not so much.
-SW

[AKIron]

I misread the report, doesn't state there was a training camp in Iraq, only that at least one terrorist group in Iraq joined Al Qaeda.

[TheDudeDVant]

Originally posted by AKIron
I misread the report, doesn't state there was a training camp in Iraq, only that at least one terrorist group in Iraq joined Al Qaeda.

After the invasion??

[AKIron]

Doesn't say when, assuming it was in the '90's. Here's a link to the report: http://www.9-11commission.gov/. Maybe you can copy and paste, all I get is little boxes, can't change the font.

[Pongo]

conservitiles dont care if any link between osama and sadam exists, they dont care if any real wmd exist. They just want one reasonable lie that cant be disproven that they can tell to justify all this to themselves.

[Martlet]

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
What am I accepting and what am I not??

Are you not guilty of selective acceptance believing against the 911 findings?? How convenient!!

You have trouble reading, too.

Where did I say I didn't believe the 9/11 findings?

[Saurdaukar]

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Glad your up to date on things..  The 6pm show is a re-run of the previous night..

Couldnt get the rights to "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" reruns?

Stewart is a joke.

[muckmaw]

Originally posted by Pongo
conservitiles dont care if any link between osama and sadam exists, they dont care if any real wmd exist. They just want one reasonable lie that cant be disproven that they can tell to justify all this to themselves.

I'm conservative and I care very much.

So in at least this case, you are wrong.

[TheDudeDVant]

Originally posted by Martlet
You have trouble reading, too.

Where did I say I didn't believe the 9/11 findings?

gee guy.. You say Iraqi and Al Queda have connections, the 911 commision said they did not..  Either you do not believe them or you are in self denial..

Now answer my question..

You say:

So you accept some things the commission claims, but not others? I get it now. Selective acceptance. How convenient.

What do I accept and what do I not accept??

[Martlet]

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
gee guy.. You say Iraqi and Al Queda have connections, the 911 commision said they did not..  Either you do not believe them or you are in self denial..

Now answer my question..

You say:  

What do I accept and what do I not accept??

Actually, as I pointed out, the 9/11 commission said Iraq and Al Qeada DID have connections.  They also said they did not cooperate on 9/11.

I agree with both statements.  You state here again that the 9/11 commission said they had no connections.  That means that you are either:

a:  tossing out one of their findings

or

b:  can't read.

Which is it?

[Krusher]

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Any watch it? Get to see our wonderful Vice president telling a straight up lie on camara??

When he lies in front of a grand jury and has his law license pulled by a federal judge tell me about it.