Author Topic: Last night's Daily Show? (Read 1454 times)

rpm · « **Reply #60 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:01:20 PM »

No. I don't need to read it again, you need to make up your mind. you either agree with the commission's report or you don't. You can't bed the truth to make up your own facts. You may have an opinion, but you have no facts.

Martlet · « **Reply #61 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:02:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
No. I don't need to read it again, you need to make up your mind. you either agree with the commission's report or you don't. You can't bed the truth to make up your own facts. You may have an opinion, but you have no facts.

If you had gone back and read the thread, you'd realize how absolutely ridiculous that comment is pertaining to this discussion.

rpm · « **Reply #62 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:03:28 PM »

Yeah Nash. I'm working on Excedrin headache # 365 : The NeoCon rant.

I know how he is. He's lonely, living alone with his Fox News feed. He thinks he wins the debate if he just keeps posting. It doesn't matter if it makes sense.

Martlet · « **Reply #63 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:06:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
Yeah Nash. I'm working on Excedrin headache # 365 : The NeoCon rant.

Heh, don't fret, when your mom comes home and explains the conversation to you you'll feel better. Then you can pick up where you left off.

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #64 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:07:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
Yeah Nash. I'm working on Excedrin headache # 365 : The NeoCon rant.

The headache would stop immediately if you would listen to Mr. Martlet instead of waiting for your turn to speak.

rpm · « **Reply #65 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:09:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Heh, don't fret, when your mom comes home and explains the conversation to you you'll feel better.

I'm not the one still living with his Mother.

Martlet · « **Reply #66 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:12:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
I'm not the one still living with his Mother.

Oh, my apologies. I guess you'll never get someone to explain the conversation to you.

You're doomed to a life of ignorance.

Excellent comeback, by the way. Get help with your next one.

rpm · « **Reply #67 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:17:52 PM »

You'll love this one then.

Martlet · « **Reply #68 on:** June 22, 2004, 06:25:05 PM »

Of course, that makes absolutely no sense, but it has as much to do with the discussion as anything else you've said.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #69 on:** June 23, 2004, 08:59:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Heh, the vicious vole spits and curses when he's backed into a corner.

Get over YOURSELF. You make contradictory statements that disprove your own argument, then you cry when your called on it? Take your elementary argument to romper room if you can't take the heat.

Otherwise, buck up and get your story straight.

LMAO Martlet... What a load of fecal matter... You have nothing... Your only tryin to make the word 'connection' imply something more.. Take your BS elsewhere.. 8)

lazs2 · « **Reply #70 on:** June 23, 2004, 09:07:57 AM »

ok... seems to me that the only couhntries that supported terrorists and that had a regime of terror and that we could get any kind of concensous on to attack were afghan and iraq...

we did that.

How would you liberals be doing things? Are you certain that your solutions would be accepted by all and so clear as to prevent any world or domestic critisim? I have heard no solutions by kerry or the left. only mudslinging.

lazs

AKIron · « **Reply #71 on:** June 23, 2004, 09:09:19 AM »

That one is easy enough to answer lazs. We saw what Clinton did for eight years. Need I say it?

capt. apathy · « **Reply #72 on:** June 23, 2004, 09:57:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
There are proven links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Are you saying that there aren't?

the point isn't if the links exist or not. (links to meetings have been shown, but any suport, or agreement comeing from these has not IIRC)

the point is that the man said the links where pretty well proven, then when the 9/11 comission says there is no meaningful link, he lies out his bellybutton and says he never said there was a link. then they run the tape showing where he did say it.

regardless of the link or not, he's a lying piece of crap. he's not lying about a BJ he's lying about 'evidence' that sent our men to die.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #73 on:** June 23, 2004, 10:04:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by capt. apathy
the point isn't if the links exist or not. (links to meetings have been shown, but any suport, or agreement comeing from these has not IIRC)

the point is that the man said the links where pretty well proven, then when the 9/11 comission says there is no meaningful link, he lies out his bellybutton and says he never said there was a link. then they run the tape showing where he did say it.

regardless of the link or not, he's a lying piece of crap. he's not lying about a BJ he's lying about 'evidence' that sent our men to die.

TY for making my point better than I could.. lol

Where is Ken Star at now??? Where are the independent investigators? Where is the Liberal media reporting on this? Why, when the lie is to a liberal media reporter does it go unreported except on a 'fake' news organization??

AKIron · « **Reply #74 on:** June 23, 2004, 10:31:45 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
AKIron what happened to you? How did you become Darth Iron of the ultra conservatives?

Happened in about '79, when Carter let Iran slap us around. Was cemented when Reagan whupped the commies.