I watched the much hyped interview of Clinton yesterday, conducted by David Dimbleby of the BBC. Apparently Clinton was supposed to lose his rag. He may have come close to it - he leaned forward and was jabbing his finger in Dimbleby's direction when questioned about ML, but that was about it. The cameras zoomed in on him at that point, but they would, wouldn't they?
Clinton maintains that he was not guilty of infidelity by his association with ML. But Dimbleby pressed him by citing the fact that many would consider Clinton's alleged activity with ML as an act which could be construed as infidelity. Dimbleby couched his questions in very specific manner - I won't repeat it word for word here. Clinton kept his guard up.
I'm sure I wasn't the only one watching who found Clinton's southern-USA phraseology a little difficult to understand at times.
Oh well, Clinton is chapeau vieux these days...