Author Topic: Saw moors film (Read 4715 times)

Steve · « **Reply #150 on:** June 27, 2004, 03:11:26 PM »

Quote

all the rage on this BBS allahsudden... which I applaud... but the next big leap is to actually use the new words you learn in a meaningful way)

Actually it relates to my realization that no matter what facts are presented to you liberals, you will not agree/ understand. You have your Bush hating mindset and liberal views which are based on how you "feel" about things and I could never change your mind with things like common sense and logic. I have a hunch you may understand an insult when you see one so it is all anyone is really left with when discussing things with handsomehunkes(politically speaking) like you, RPM, Pongo, and your ilk.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #151 on:** June 27, 2004, 11:55:30 PM »

One more Moore lie in F911...

That it was somehow unusual for the secret service to guard the saudi embassy...

http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/ud.shtml

PROTECTION
Uniformed Division

After several name revisions, the force officially adopted its current name, the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division in 1977. While protection of the White House Complex remains its primary mission, the Uniformed Division's responsibilities have expanded greatly over the years.

They now protect the following:

the White House Complex, the Main Treasury Building and Annex, and other Presidential offices;
the President and members of the immediate family;
the temporary official residence of the Vice President in the District of Columbia;
the Vice President and members of the immediate family; and
foreign diplomatic missions in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area and throughout the United States, and its territories and possessions, as prescribed by statute.

This is a pretty significant lie, considering the weight Moore places on suposed speacial treament to the Saudis...

Bodhi · « **Reply #152 on:** June 28, 2004, 12:12:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
Its certainly easy to make it confusing.
The blacks that where illegaly struck off the voters lists because they had the same last name as an ex felon though..thats not confusing at all. And the Bush brothers are setting up to do it again. The republicans are trying to get the same technology going in other states for November.
This year there will be electronic voting devices..they dont leave any inconvientent paper behind to get recounted. Your state attourney general can just
"Delete * from votes where voter race = 'the enemy'" and there they go!
So there will be more controversy. But less proof.

yet again you generalise where you make an ASSumption and yet again, u make an prettythang out of yourself...

Gosh it must piss you off pongo that you have NO say in what goes on in this country, yet WE have SO MUCH say in what goes on in yours...

Nash · « **Reply #153 on:** June 28, 2004, 12:18:01 AM »

Grun, maybe you caught Moore in a lie.

I wouldn't know, because you don't actually say what it is Moore said about this. You may have nailed it in the response, but you're missing the actual "lie" part.

Nash · « **Reply #154 on:** June 28, 2004, 12:32:16 AM »

btw.... way to sneak this in:

"One more Moore lie in F911..."

One more?

There have been others? There's been even one?

Which would those be?

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #155 on:** June 28, 2004, 05:48:57 AM »

Nash:

"That it was somehow unusual for the secret service to guard the saudi embassy..."

Have you even seen F911?

In the movie he goes to the Saudi Embassy in DC. He films some stuff and soon he is approached by a pair of uniformed Secret Service officers who are guarding the embassy. The movie makes the point that it is somehow unusual for the secret service to protect foreign emabasies - his point being that the saudi embassy got extra special treatment.

As I pointed out with the secret service website this is not the case.

Pretty simple lie and very easy to check out..

AKcurly · « **Reply #156 on:** June 28, 2004, 06:30:17 AM »

Yeager · « **Reply #157 on:** June 28, 2004, 08:22:05 AM »

I was going to vote for Senator Kerry this election but I have changed my mind. I am going to vote for Ralph Nader.

I believe all good democrats should join me and cast a vote for change, real change.

Vote for Ralph Nader this November.
====
Im Yeager and I approve this message.

lazs2 · « **Reply #158 on:** June 28, 2004, 08:37:00 AM »

give me 1 hour of moore being interviewed and I could make a documentary that had him admiting that he was a lying pedophile who that had worked on a drug that would kill canadian babies.

and... I wouldn't be sued over it.

lazs

Saintaw · « **Reply #159 on:** June 28, 2004, 09:15:05 AM »

Geez, what a bunch of old ladies crapping their pants about a movie. Get over it will ya.

hawker238 · « **Reply #160 on:** June 28, 2004, 09:33:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Saintaw
Geez, what a bunch of old ladies crapping their pants about a movie. Get over it will ya.

Hahaha, thank you.

Nash · « **Reply #161 on:** June 28, 2004, 09:45:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
give me 1 hour of moore being interviewed and I could make a documentary that had him admiting that he was a lying pedophile who that had worked on a drug that would kill canadian babies.

and... I wouldn't be sued over it.

lazs

That would be interesting to see.

How do you want me to send the vid to ya? FTP or Yahoo or something else?

Scatcat · « **Reply #162 on:** June 28, 2004, 10:00:01 AM »

I ain't payin to watch his trash.

AKIron · « **Reply #163 on:** June 28, 2004, 10:08:25 AM »

Haven't seen the movie but from what I've heard and know about Moore he doesn't actually lie because he never actually says anything. He takes things wildly out of context to lead the gullible to the conclusions he would have them reach. Anyone with even the least sense of honesty should find such deceit repugnant.

Pongo · « **Reply #164 on:** June 28, 2004, 10:18:49 AM »

Bohdi.
Is that your way of saying you dont like me to be interested in your politics?