Author Topic: F20 Tigershark  (Read 826 times)

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
F20 Tigershark
« on: June 26, 2004, 09:36:57 PM »
Does anyone recall the F20 Tigershark? if not, it was the "Mig" in Topgun.

I had a photo of it back in the 90's when I was in college,m but I cant remember what happened to it and why it was never put into full production.

Always looked like a sweet ride to me...anyway, any input would be helpful...just curious.

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2004, 09:46:31 PM »
If I recall, it was a further development of the F-5 family of planes (which were the agressors in Top Gun).

As far as I can tell, there just wasn't any mission for the F-20. I don't remember why it didn't excell as an export fighter, but I thought there was some contraversy.

I once did some translation work for one of the Program pilots who was going over to Russia to get himself a Russian bride lol.

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline J_A_B

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3012
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2004, 09:47:40 PM »
The Topgun "migs" were F-5's,which are the predecessor of the F-20.  The F-5 is a lightweight twin-engine fighter.

There were only a few F-20's ever made.  The F-20 was an updated model of the F-5 with a single engine (the same type of engine that the F-15 and F-16 have) and better electronics.  Chuck Yeager was a well-known proponent of the F-20; he liked it because of its superb maneuverability and pointability in A2A combat.   The USAF stuck with the F-16 instead.


Edit:  MY bad....it shared the same powerplant as the F-18

J_A_B
« Last Edit: June 27, 2004, 08:00:52 PM by J_A_B »

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2004, 12:36:48 AM »
Monogram made a 1/48th Scale model of the F20 way back when.  Not a bad kit at all.

It showed up in commercials with Yeager after it was turned down by the AF.  I think it was a company funded program too.

Dan/Slack
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2004, 01:14:51 AM »
The F-20 had the same engine as the F-18, not the F-15/16. Yes it was a company funded program like the F-5 was. The F-20 program sank Northrop in the military aircraft market.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2004, 01:43:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
The F-20 had the same engine as the F-18, not the F-15/16. Yes it was a company funded program like the F-5 was. The F-20 program sank Northrop in the military aircraft market.


So why did the genius's at Northrup even develop the F-20 if there was no clear objective or payoff for all the work invested?  Pretty stupid if you ask me.  But you didn't so who really cares.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Mathman

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1921
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2004, 02:46:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DiabloTX
So why did the genius's at Northrup even develop the F-20 if there was no clear objective or payoff for all the work invested?  Pretty stupid if you ask me.  But you didn't so who really cares.


IIRC, the F-20 was primarily designed for the export market to compete with the F-16.  Depending on what you believe, it was better in almost all respects to the F-16, but GD and the US government kind of did a Microsoft and forced friendly nations to buy the F-16 instead.

I don't know if that is true or not, but you never know.  Not a big deal to me if it is or not.  Kind of fits the mold though.

Offline Tony Williams

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
      • http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2004, 03:06:02 AM »
When it was first planned the F-20 was known as the F-5G and was intended to incorporate the minimum changes needed to accept the new engine, so that older F-5 could be converted. By the time development was complete, there were so many changes that this was no longer possible. So bang went one possible market.

The F-20 was then in direct competition with the F-16, but the F-16 had the overwhelming advantage of having been bought by the US Government, so everyone wanted that instead. No-one wanted the risk of being the launch customer for a new aircraft like the F-20.

Pity really, it would have introduced an interesting new gun, the 'Tigerclaws', developed from the M39 to be much lighter and faster-firing.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2004, 03:12:48 AM »
There's one sitting on the ramp at torance's airport, Los Angeles. (Or used to 2 years ago, I doubt they moved it).
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2004, 03:48:06 AM »
IIRC Northrop actually designed the YF-17 to compete with the F-16. Later  McDonnell Douglas joined project (and actually took it all over) and the result was the F-18. The F-20 was Northrops's private venture project aimed for export market to replace huge number of F-5s serving around the world. AFAIK USAF never planned to buy it; at the time F-20 prototype flew, the F-16 was allready chossen for the USAF.

gripen

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #10 on: June 27, 2004, 09:46:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tony Williams

The F-20 was then in direct competition with the F-16, but the F-16 had the overwhelming advantage of having been bought by the US Government, so everyone wanted that instead. No-one wanted the risk of being the launch customer for a new aircraft like the F-20.

Pity really, it would have introduced an interesting new gun, the 'Tigerclaws', developed from the M39 to be much lighter and faster-firing.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum


This is what I remember reading about it at the time. Was like 20 something years ago wasnt it?

I remember Yeager being quoted as saying he liked it better then the F-16 saying about it.
"The F-20 is the most advanced fighter I ever flew"
Another plus I remember reading about it at the time was it was easier to maintain then the F-16 and could scramble and get airborn faster. That is go from hanger to in the air in it was something like half the tie of the F-16.
For whatever reason the military decided on the F-16 instead. which was plagued with wiring problems and even grounded for a while in its frst few years in service.
least thats what I remember.

If nothing else it was one sharp looking aircraft

Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #11 on: June 27, 2004, 11:06:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
The F-20 had the same engine as the F-18, not the F-15/16. Yes it was a company funded program like the F-5 was. The F-20 program sank Northrop in the military aircraft market.


lol sunk Northrop?  lmfao

Guess you forgot this little gem that earns them a little over 1 billion a copy....  




Unit cost: Approximately $1.157 billion (fiscal 98 constant dollars) so figure about 1.5 billion now.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #12 on: June 27, 2004, 11:18:07 AM »
That is not a Northrop ... that's a Northrop Grumman. The F-20 nearly bankrupted Northrop, and they were forced to merge with Grumman to survive. At least that's what I read about the development of the F-20 some years ago.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2004, 11:29:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
That is not a Northrop ... that's a Northrop Grumman. The F-20 nearly bankrupted Northrop, and they were forced to merge with Grumman to survive. At least that's what I read about the development of the F-20 some years ago.


The B-2 was on the drawing boards and in preproduction long before the merger.  I followed the merger talks with great anticipation as I own a fair amount of Northrop-Grumman stock, that was all Grumman before the merger.

Ohh the B-2 first deployed in late '93 btw and the companies merged in late 94.

edited for spelling
« Last Edit: June 27, 2004, 11:35:16 AM by Bodhi »
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
F20 Tigershark
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2004, 07:51:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK


If nothing else it was one sharp looking aircraft



Sure was...thanks for the replies everyone