Originally posted by hubsonfire
Arlo, who? Where?
Who the hell are you? Why can't you follow a thread? 
Parity? Really needed? You mean like not having 160 vs 80 vs 130 in the MA? Or some nearly forgotten Lithuanian Naval Bomber/French press machine for the CT?
You've had enough crack, today.
(Hint ... the MA has all it needs ... ever. The CT/SEA doesn't. Get it? No? Didn't think so). 
"Gee, since I can't get my planes, I'll just flame everyone else's suggestions"
Again .... who the hell are you and why can't you keep up? 
Pyro asked for three reasonable suggestions in three categories:
Fighter: Ki-84 (pretty good chance) Why? Because it beefs up a slightly anorexic Japanese planeset and allows for the late war USN planeset to be used more freely in the Ct and in the SEA. (And ... just for argument's sake ... it'd even be a good MA fighter. Not that the MA
needs another uber fighter)
Bomber: Betty or Billy Mitchell .... some say the B-24 Why? First two help out early/midwar CT and SEA planesets. Not great for the MA? Who gives a poop. B-24? Sure ... but later. It isn't like the MA needs new bombers all that much either.
GV: Shermie or T-34 Why? Should about explain itself but here it is:
There are no allied MBTs in the game ... period. The CT and the SEA could use them. The MA may see some use of these .... but again, who gives a poop because all the lil chesspiece countries already got Tigers and Panzers .... throwing in a T-34 is just another fuggin' tank.
All that B-29, P-61, Wirbelwind, flying saucer crap is kinda like voting for Nader in the upcoming election.
