Author Topic: Would any figher provide a better front view then this?  (Read 1368 times)

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2004, 05:54:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by RTSigma
I just about dry-heaved when I saw that odd-looking plane Furball put up.

It doesn't look very fun to fly, its like having a P-38 with one engine.


The pilots like the Bv141. One problem was it used the same engine as the Fw190A. There was not enough to go around.

David Myrha has put out a book on the a/c.

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2004, 01:16:15 PM »
Please tell me that thing came with its own Wookie....

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #32 on: July 29, 2004, 01:24:15 PM »
whats a poke?
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #33 on: July 29, 2004, 01:35:30 PM »
That B&V was a competitor to the Fw189 army observation/attack plane.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Adogg

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #34 on: July 29, 2004, 01:36:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OIO
Please tell me that thing came with its own Wookie....


...and a faulty cobled together .5 class hyperdrive, four repeating blasters in ventral and dorsal turrets; two concussion missle launchers, oh and a sensor dish currently in the shop.

:)

I'm a geek so sue me.

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #35 on: July 30, 2004, 11:55:35 AM »
TWO concussion missle launchers? those things can be expensive for smugglers, maybe one launcher.

As for repeating blasters I think they'd go for range against TIE's and get with a Quad Blaster Cannon.

As for a wookie, what about a robot like IG-88, 4-LOM or perhaps a personal female computer named Flit?

(I am a nerd that got cooler, but still knows his SW from his books)

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS

Offline SELECTOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2742
      • http://www.332viking.com
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #36 on: August 02, 2004, 05:16:25 PM »
i would also say the p39 and p63 had a better front view..

Offline Adogg

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #37 on: August 03, 2004, 11:58:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by RTSigma
TWO concussion missle launchers? those things can be expensive for smugglers, maybe one launcher.

As for repeating blasters I think they'd go for range against TIE's and get with a Quad Blaster Cannon.

As for a wookie, what about a robot like IG-88, 4-LOM or perhaps a personal female computer named Flit?

(I am a nerd that got cooler, but still knows his SW from his books)


Touche...quad blasters they are.

I stand by the twin concussion missle launchers. One in each mandible I think.

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
Would any figher provide a better front view then this?
« Reply #38 on: August 03, 2004, 03:12:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
whats a poke?

mon