Author Topic: Helicopters?  (Read 1347 times)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Helicopters?
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2004, 11:34:00 AM »
One of the early Sikorsky's. S-51 perhaps? (unless the R-4 or R-6 low numbers count as mass produced)
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Canaris

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
Helicopters?
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2004, 11:40:45 AM »
I feel helicopters are not needed.  I would rather see some more early war fighters than a helicopter which didnt grab its fame till the Vietnam War.  Yes it was used in WW2 but not to an extent as it was used in Vietnam.  

 What could we possibly use a helicopter for?  The fighters in AH would have more speed and guns than the helicopter so basically its good as dead.

  We need some more early war fighters, definately no more late war fighters.  Could use some more bombers and vehicles.  


Canaris

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
Helicopters?
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2004, 02:51:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Canaris
I feel helicopters are not needed.  I would rather see some more early war fighters than a helicopter which didnt grab its fame till the Vietnam War.  Yes it was used in WW2 but not to an extent as it was used in Vietnam.  

 What could we possibly use a helicopter for?  The fighters in AH would have more speed and guns than the helicopter so basically its good as dead.

  We need some more early war fighters, definately no more late war fighters.  Could use some more bombers and vehicles.  


Canaris




THINK KOREA???  ever watch M+A+S+H
known as Arctic in the main

Offline Canaris

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
Helicopters?
« Reply #18 on: July 28, 2004, 03:14:48 PM »
Simshell, ive watched MASH a very good shot. disappointed it ended.  

  Yes i know they were used in Korea for taking casualties back to hospitals.  But the helicopters grew their fame in Vietnam.  Helicopters in Vietnam were used to asssist ground troops, bring troops to the frontlines and take casualties to the hospitals.  

  Helicopters did not gain fame in WW2, that is the point im trying to make to point out we dont need helicopters in AH.

Canaris

Offline Tails

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 604
Helicopters?
« Reply #19 on: July 28, 2004, 03:37:16 PM »
On top of that, helicopters didnt start to take on a noticable offensive roll until well after WW2...

So if we got whirlies, what exactly would you do with them?
BBTT KTLI KDRU HGQK GDKA SODA HMQP ACES KQTP TLZF LKHQ JAWS SMZJ IDDS RLLS CHAV JEUS BDLI WFJH WQZQ FTXM WUTL KH

(Yup, foxy got an Enigma to play with)

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
Helicopters?
« Reply #20 on: July 28, 2004, 04:41:41 PM »
only thing that comes to mind would be taking off from a CV fleet and droping troops or landing them in the town:D


but i would rather see a PBY before a helo
known as Arctic in the main

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
Helicopters?
« Reply #21 on: July 28, 2004, 09:28:27 PM »
Quote
I feel helicopters are not needed.


Needed?  This is a game, nothing is needed.  But helicopters would bring alot of fun to AH2.  Just the helo flight model itself would make them fun.

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
Helicopters?
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2004, 12:56:56 AM »
how about some jetpacks
:rolleyes:

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Helicopters?
« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2004, 03:08:02 AM »
Put two rockets on them, give them 1 7.62 mg on them with a 15 deg up, down, left and right arc, and give it a horrible GPH rating.

Perk it to about 150.

It's function: to stop underage drinking

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS

Offline Turbo11

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
No Heli's.
« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2004, 10:52:30 PM »
I don't think there should be heli's, the first successful helicopter flight was in 1941.

Offline hawker238

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1563
Helicopters?
« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2004, 11:36:51 PM »
Hot stuff....



Look at the twin rotor setup.  That actually seems kind of ingenious.  Judging by modern helicopters, I guess it isn't.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Helicopters?
« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2004, 11:53:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BUG_EAF322
how about some jetpacks
:rolleyes:


And B-92s with Nooks! B-92s won the war! And JaggedPanthars! And ... and ... Sabarjets! Sabarjets won the war!




Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Helicopters?
« Reply #27 on: August 04, 2004, 01:06:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hawker238
Hot stuff....



Look at the twin rotor setup.  That actually seems kind of ingenious.  Judging by modern helicopters, I guess it isn't.


There are more modern helicopters with similar rotor setups, but most use the classic Sikorsky setup or coaxial rotors nowadays.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline hawker238

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1563
Helicopters?
« Reply #28 on: August 04, 2004, 11:10:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
There are more modern helicopters with similar rotor setups, but most use the classic Sikorsky setup or coaxial rotors nowadays.


Really?  I've never seen two rotors next to each other.  Are you talking about a counter-rotating design, such as the Kamov bureau?  That's a bit different.

edit: Duuuuuuuuuh, co-axial.  Sorry, wasn't thinking.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2004, 11:18:13 PM by hawker238 »

Offline Hades55

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Helicopters?
« Reply #29 on: August 05, 2004, 12:26:36 AM »
I feel that someone want to bring Apache+hellfires in AH  8-/