Author Topic: Troops  (Read 547 times)

Offline Fariz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1087
      • http://9giap.warriormage.com
Troops
« on: August 11, 2004, 04:19:26 AM »
HTC, please add more troops barracks or increase barracs toughness at the fields. Today I watched 1 la7 killed troops at 3 front line fields within 10 min. 1 250lb tought barracks at small field is very unballancing for a strat play, in fact it is almost impossibe to defend field against fast marauders.

Offline rogerdee

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
      • http://rogerdee.co.uk
Troops
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2004, 06:06:48 AM »
yesterday me  and bluej  spent  most  of  the  time  killing  barracks  and  was  only stoped when whels  came  back  from lunch.
it  seems  we all have  the same  problem  but   it  should be  harder

rogerdee
490th battling bulldogs
www.rogerdee.co.uk

it does what it says on the tin

Offline AKcurly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
Re: Troops
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2004, 07:01:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fariz
HTC, please add more troops barracks or increase barracs toughness at the fields. Today I watched 1 la7 killed troops at 3 front line fields within 10 min. 1 250lb tought barracks at small field is very unballancing for a strat play, in fact it is almost impossibe to defend field against fast marauders.


Bite your tongue, Boyo.  It's the only way an outnumbered country can survive now. ;)

curly

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
Re: Troops
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2004, 08:18:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fariz
HTC, please add more troops barracks or increase barracs toughness at the fields. Today I watched 1 la7 killed troops at 3 front line fields within 10 min. 1 250lb tought barracks at small field is very unballancing for a strat play, in fact it is almost impossibe to defend field against fast marauders.


shoot him down :rolleyes:

they stopped fuel porking because no one wanted to defend, now you want them to stop barrack porking? :rolleyes:

i got 6 fields yesterday in my Mossie...seems rooks dont like defending........:lol
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline TalonX

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
Porking Troops
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2004, 08:22:23 AM »
It SUCKS!!!!!!

That said, it's great tactics....  I agree with those that say - defend.  

You don't like it, DEFEND against it...the answer isn't making troops invulnerable...anymore than making fuel un-porkable..(although I am glad they did - heheh)
-TalonX

Forgotten, but back in the game.  :)

Offline BlueJ1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5826
Troops
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2004, 12:36:28 PM »
Yes myself and roger porked troops of all of the southern Knight bases, bout 10 bases, in about 10 minutes. We had all porked eccept a2, where  Whels decided to up a yak and kill both of us. It was alot of fun porking the bases, was hopeing for some defense tho besides Whels.
U.S.N.
Aviation Electrician MH-60S
OEF 08-09'

Offline 68DevilM

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
Re: Troops
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2004, 12:44:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fariz
HTC, please add more troops barracks or increase barracs toughness at the fields. Today I watched 1 la7 killed troops at 3 front line fields within 10 min. 1 250lb tought barracks at small field is very unballancing for a strat play, in fact it is almost impossibe to defend field against fast marauders.


have to say that with out the option to take out front line troops, us poor knites would be reset everynight.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Troops
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2004, 12:48:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fariz
Today I watched 1 la7 killed troops at 3 front line fields within 10 min.

Offline Fariz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1087
      • http://9giap.warriormage.com
Troops
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2004, 05:56:08 PM »
It shall be in the game, still in barracks case game is unballaned. It shall be 3 barracks at the different parts of a field, then it will require at least 2 passes and lots of ammo, or bombs and rockets which will make plane slower and easier to intercept.

Offline Fariz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1087
      • http://9giap.warriormage.com
Re: Re: Troops
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2004, 06:01:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKcurly
Bite your tongue, Boyo.  It's the only way an outnumbered country can survive now. ;)

curly


Hehehe.

Well, I want them to make it the work of skill for jabo pilot, because when I see how it is now, I start losing my interest in a fields capture. Work of 10 people for 30 min. for a capture, then it comes one la7, makes one fast pass, 20 sec., less than 1/3 of ammo, and you need to wait another 1.5 hour to move ahead.

Offline mojo55

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
Troops
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2004, 11:30:32 AM »
2 cargo drops will fix troops

Offline CMC Airboss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 705
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
Troops
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2004, 01:46:56 PM »
Until troop tent hardness is increased, there are two solutions - 1) Taking down nearby fighter hangars is highly effective at discouraging the short legged La-7's from hitting multiple bases.  
2) Having available C-47 cargo runs negates the effect of troop raids.

The notion that an effective and reliable defense can be raised against a determined fast fighter attack mission is ludicrous.  

MiG