« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: New rules  (Read 1753 times)

Offline Hyrax81st

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
New rules
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2004, 05:04:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shane
some topics need to be punted sometimes, especially informative ones...


I guess we request it to be "stickied" in that case.
Logged

Offline Shane

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8054
New rules
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2004, 05:07:11 PM »
many aren't critical enough to be stickied - they're infrequent but recurring topics. plus who wants a full page of stickys?
Logged
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Roscoroo

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8424
      • http://www.roscoroo.com/
New rules
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2004, 05:13:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shane
many aren't critical enough to be stickied - they're infrequent but recurring topics. plus who wants a full page of stickys?



theres a few in the training thread the get punted alot ... and in the hardware software forum theres a couple that get punted alot ... (Blooms pc arcitecture thread is a main one that come to mind)  and once and awhile we punt some other info type threads just so we dont have to repeat ourselves every other week .
Logged
Roscoroo ,
"Of course at Uncle Teds restaurant , you have the option to shoot them yourself"  Ted Nugent
(=Ghosts=Scenariroo's  Patch donation

Offline JB73

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8780
New rules
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2004, 05:18:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B17Skull12
mozilla to JB.
i don't care for firefox... too buggy especially how in here the box to enter text in a post is like only 30 charecters wide. very annoying for me personally.
Logged
I don't know what to put here yet.

Offline Killjoy2

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 421
      • http://www.nortonfamily.net
New rules
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2004, 05:31:10 PM »
The RULES are all negative.  

How about some positive guidelines.  New readers might get the wrong/right impression.
Logged

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
New rules
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2004, 05:34:36 PM »
Dang...does this mean I'm gonna have to wait until 01-01-2011 to call Pyro a sissy?! ;)
Logged
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline Hyrax81st

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
New rules
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2004, 10:19:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shane
many aren't critical enough to be stickied - they're infrequent but recurring topics. plus who wants a full page of stickys?


Perhaps a dedicated "sticky" Forum, then ? with their unique threads all nicely tucked away in exactly the right spot. Punting threads always seemed like a nasty workaround anyway. If it gets lost in any particular forum maybe their own forum would help. We could call it the Skuzzy Sticky Forum of Critical or Infrequent but Recurring Topics.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2004, 10:22:07 PM by Hyrax81st »
Logged

Offline twitchy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
Amen!
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2004, 02:07:05 AM »


It was badly needed, Way To Go!!!
Logged
Founder & CO
Pigs on the Wing
Oinking Bases since 2000 AD

Offline DipStick

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2157
      • http://www.theblueknights.com
New rules
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2004, 02:31:07 AM »
WTG HTC! It's about time and a breath of fresh air. :D

I think Shane is referring to some of the more useful posts in the "Help and Training Forum". I'd agree we could use a place / seperate forum for those. It's gets old seeing the same questions asked over and over and then having to link to the old threads. IMO.
Logged

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12430
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
New rules
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2004, 08:22:53 AM »
Pryo and I were having trouble how to describe what is acceptible punting.

I agree on the information type topics. What we dont wish to see is
1. punting up very old topics.
2. punting a post you just made every day because you are not getting a response.

Those are the 2 normal abuses I can think of.


HiTech
Logged

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
New rules
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2004, 08:44:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
Pryo and I were having trouble how to describe what is acceptible punting.

I agree on the information type topics. What we dont wish to see is
1. punting up very old topics.
2. punting a post you just made every day because you are not getting a response.

Those are the 2 normal abuses I can think of.


HiTech


Hitech,

Seriously, I’m not trying to be a wise guy here, but in regards to this rule:

“4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.”

Would this include Paul Hinds/Voss?  I’m not talking about starting a new 2K bash Voss thread every two months, just the typical Voss wisecrack.  Is he a “user” or a public figure?

eskimo
Logged

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12430
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
New rules
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2004, 08:48:37 AM »
Good question Eskimo:

Im thinking the wise cracks should be droped. Other thoughts?


HiTech
Logged

Offline Alpo

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1516
New rules
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2004, 09:07:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
Pryo and I were having trouble how to describe what is acceptible punting.

I agree on the information type topics. What we dont wish to see is
1. punting up very old topics.
2. punting a post you just made every day because you are not getting a response.

Those are the 2 normal abuses I can think of.


HiTech



One of the major reasons I see people punting is they feel their messages are not getting to you HT.  I'm don't mean that you are not reading or ignoring them, just that you may not be reading every freaking message on this board... can't blame you there, this is a verbose bunch of dweebs ;)

Would it be possible for a weekly (even bi-weekly) update or something on current issues you are looking into?  It might actually clear up a lot of the speculation about certain situations (ie.  ToD status, thoughs on the ENY disabling, etc.)   Think about how every time Pyro posts pictures of the latest stuff how excited everyone becomes...

Just a $0.02 suggestion. ;)
Logged
SkyKnights Fighter Group -CO-
R.I.P.  SKDenny 02/03/1940 - 02/19/2012

...

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
New rules
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2004, 09:09:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
Good question Eskimo:

Im thinking the wise cracks should be droped. Other thoughts?


HiTech


Not trying to argue here, but certainly you expect BBS posters to poke fun at political figures, celebrities, characters, and public figures (people who make the news big time).  

Voss was(/is?) an AH player, but he has certainly acclaimed public figure status.  

Along the same line, how do your feel about BBS posters tastefully poking fun at you and Skuzzy?  You take the spelling jabs very well, but certainly you shouldn’t be expected to put up with downright insults either…

eskimo
Logged

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12430
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
New rules
« Reply #29 on: August 18, 2004, 09:19:28 AM »
Can only speek for myself.

Most people understand the difference between having fun WITH someone , VS inslutling them, or trying to get a rise out of them just to make them mad.

But realy can not think of a single other person simlar to the voss question.

HiTech
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »