Author Topic: The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts  (Read 3839 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
There is something I have noticed that happens when people state a desire to see a given aircraft in AH.  There are people who will try to shoot the idea down on the basis that said aircraft will not see much use.  There is a fallacy in that line of reasoning.

There are very few WWII era aircraft left to be added to AH that will be commonly seen in the MA as it is structured now.

Depending on the perk price (the F4U-1C has shown that cheap perk planes can be very common) I think the following aircraft are about all that remains on the popular list.  Some of these will be priced too high to be common.

Ki-84 Hiyate (Likely to be a cheap perk, IMO)
P-51H Mustang (Likely to be priced too high to be common)
F4U-4 Corsair (Likely to be priced too high to be common)
Spitfire Mk "Anything more modern than what we already have" (Price will range from free to too high to be common depending on the version)
Meteor MkIII (Price will certainly be too high to be common)
Me262a (Price will certainly be too high to be common)
He162a (Price will certainly be too high to be common)
Yak-9UT (The La-7 has shown that people will fly Russian if its good enough)
Yak-3 (The La-7 has shown that people will fly Russian if its good enough)

Other contenders that I do not feel will be common:

G.55 (Based on the usage of Italian aircraft I don't think this one will be common)
Re.2005 (Based on the usage of Italian aircraft I don't think this one will be common)
J2M3 Raiden (I don't think this will have the performance to be common)
P-47M Thunderbolt (Price is likely to me reasonably high and none of the 3 P-47s we already have get much use)
B-29A Superfortress (Likely to be priced too high to be common and bombers simply aren't that common to begin with)
Tu-2 (Bombers simply aren't that common)

I think that most of the aircraft that we see requested on this board fall under the "neat" category and that will suffer the same fate as the Il-2M.  Examples of this are things like the Me410A, Mosquito FB.VI, Ki102, P-61B Blackwidow and H8K2 "Emily".  These are all worthy additions and I would love to see them all, but I honestly don't see any of them breaking 5000 sorties per Tour.

The other common request is for early war aircraft, but those will see light usage simply because of the 1944 MA setup that we have.

Most of the great fighters have been added, there are no better Fw190s or Bf109s left to be added, and the nature of the current MA means that multi-role aircraft such as the Me410A and Mosquito FB.VI are at a massive disadvantage compared to their historical use.

Because of my conclusions on these things I think that we should lower our expectations of having new aircraft, with a few exceptions, be very common in the MA.  We should be less hostile to the requests for rarer or specialty aircraft of others.

I would like to see HTC add the neat specialty aircraft as well as the remaining super units, but I don't think that we need 8 per release like we got in 1.06.  I would like to see real gameplay improvements, such as roads, rail and supply issues.  Possibly productions sites that are responsible for the manufacture of certain units.

1.08 sounds like it is shapeing up to be a great release.  No units have been announced, but it seems that a road and rail system will be added as well as the upgrade to DirectX 8.  The three units I would like to see in 1.08 are the Mosquito FB.VI Series 2, Me410A and P1Y1 Ginga.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline swebber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2001, 02:11:00 PM »
If they model a B-29, you can bet i'll be flying it as soon as i'm able :P

Better bring out the TA-152's, and a lot of em to bring me down over your HQ's   :D

<S!> Hamish!

[ 06-30-2001: Message edited by: Someone ]

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2001, 02:22:00 PM »
Good post, cept P51H should never be in AH, under any circumstances. Tho honestly I feel it be no more dangerous than the P51D as theyll just run away even faster, and priced way more then a Tempest would be very rare.

The 262 will just be plain useless in MA, all ull have to do is roll out of plane when it dives on you. If hes a fool and tries to fite in vertical hell soon loose e slow down and be forced to dive away if he can. I know engine reliability issues arent gonna be in AH, but somehow HTC must model the reality of the 262 engines. You HAD to throttle them slowly or they will suffer a burn out and stop working. This must be in the 262 model, thats is if HTC cares about realism these days. Argghh sorry HTC kinda cheap shot there, but I feel this should be in 262 model if u decide to make it.

As for me I have spent exactly $0.00 perkies so far, and I dont see that changing soon.   :)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2001, 02:36:00 PM »
Heya GRUN,

I was just mentioning the aircraft that have been bandied about.

About the throttle on the Me262 (Ar234 should have the same issues), I see two ways of doing that:

1) The player can slam the trottle around as much as they want, but the actuall thrust will only increase or decrease slowly.
2) If the player is too rough with the engine it will flame out, effectively simulated by having the engine be destroyed.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Fariz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1087
      • http://9giap.warriormage.com
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2001, 02:49:00 PM »
Interesting if adding 262 will down the perk cost of arado?

Right now nothing can catch it until good bounce.

With 262 it will be all of a different story  :)

Fariz

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2001, 03:53:00 PM »
You guys may not have noticed, but AH does actually already model the slow throttle up and down on the 234.  I'd say it takes about 10 seconds to go from idle to full power.

(ME262 would be fun for bomber hunting.  ;) )

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2001, 04:35:00 PM »
Does this mean we can't expect to see:

 *Bf-109E7
 *Hawker Hurricane MKI
 *Supermarine Spitfire MKI
 *Do-17Z
 *He-111H
 *Ju-87B STUKA

 ...

 Someday.. someday
 We'll get to see my dream plane set for The Battle of Britain.. Someday...

 
 
   :(

Offline DanielMcIntyre

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 367
      • http://None as yet
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2001, 05:04:00 PM »
if you do that to the 262, will also have to make nik fly in real atmosphere, instead of the zero resistance envelope it fly's in now  :)

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2001, 10:57:00 PM »
aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh the atmosphere
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2001, 07:12:00 AM »
P-61, A-26 non-perked. Slow mofos, big and bristling with nose guns, have as much defensive turret firepower as an il-2.

Mossie: cheap perk (its fast!).

Ju88 with cannons : Flying it as a fighter should GIVE you lots of perks heehee.

Me-262 & Meteor: I agree that these planes should be perked, but not so expensive. They have very short range, need a lot of space to climb and dont accel very well. Once they get going though, thats another story  :) Heck, I think the max perk cost for any plane should be 20 perks (with the B-29 & Nuke package costing 100 perks heehee!)

Offline lazs1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 996
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2001, 08:30:00 AM »
well... perks are stupid.  They make the game more and more 'elite' and less friendly to the newcomer.  I don't want to beat up newbies in a -4 Corsair any more than they would like being beat up.   I would rather chase off a bunch of flabby "vets" than have a bunch of nebies (rightfully) turn up their nose at our elitism and idiotic bassackword perk game.

Face it...  the idiotic perk idea is a hashed up nightmare of a temporary solution.  Your post points this out.  The more planes we add the worse it gets.  Really... HTC  will have to come up with something better even if it limits choice a little.

We can't have superplanes and prototypes flying in the same arena as P40's and Spit ones... It's just that simple.  

A simple and well thought out RPS for early, mid and late war planes would be the next logical step but...  

Much as I like early war planes I will admit that they are probly not as popular as the mid war ones so... a short early war.  A very long mid war and a very short late war.  Maybe a day or two at the end for ultra uber planes.

Course... if we had an 'area' arena we wouldn't have any of these problems.
lazs

Offline Mark Luper

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1626
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2001, 08:38:00 AM »
Karnak,
That was a very well thought out and presented post. I appreciate posts like that. It is hard for me to think of the 47 not being used much since that is all my squadron flies most of the time  :).

I too would like to see the perk point requirements drop. Personaly I think the arado is way over priced. But that is my opinion.

MarkAT

Keep the shiny side up!

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2001, 09:03:00 AM »
Kinda funny to worry about the ability of the 262s engine to handle what we do to it, considering we dont do that on any of the other planes in the game.

In AH now, you can run a P51 at full throttle from start to stop without any problem.  The real engine really wouldnt take such abuse, not for the long flights.

And as far as the 262 not having any effect in the game, think again.  I had some of my best sorties, with highest number of kills per flight in a 262 in WB.  Granted its easy to avoid, to a point, but it does have some real strenghts that cant be ignored.  In the hands of a guy that knows how to fly it well, its a hell of an aircraft.

Wanna talk vultching?  The 262 is the ultimate vultching aircraft.  It can roar down a field at such a speed the ack cant touch it.  No longer restricted to fields that have the ack killed, you can vultch at random anywhere.

And, Jet -vs- Jet dogfights are a blast.

Dago
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2001, 12:57:00 PM »
Fariz,

Maybe.  It would be nice for people like me to which the price of the Tempest and Ar234 is too high (I know there are plyers with multiple thousands of perk points).  It seems more likely that the perk price for the Me262a, He162 and Meteor MkIII would be in the 100 to 200 point range.

Kweassa,

I hope that those get added sometime.  That was kinda the point of my post.  To show that aircraft that won't see much action are entirely valid additions.  Most of the aircraft which will see heavy use have already been added.

Tac,

Perk the Mosquito?  :confused: Why?  If it were free it will barely see any use, as a perk it'll never get used.  You say that it is fast, well, on the deck (I am talking about the FB.VI Series 2 here) against its historical opponents it was fast, but AH is full of things that will easily out run it and out manuver it.  Things like the P-51B, P-51D, F4U-1D, F4U-1C, Bf109G-10, Fw190D-9, Yak-9U, La-5FN, La-7 and the Typhoon MkIb.  The Mosquito FB.VI can do about 345mph (with WEP) on the deck and peaks at about 380mph at its best altitude.

In AH it would have to contend with the fact that if it meets a Bf109 or an Fw190 they will almost certainly be a G-10 and D-9 respectively.  Historically that would have been the exception rather than the rule in 1944/45 and never would happen in 1943.  Furthermore it will have to contend with the fast Allied fighters, American, British and Russian, that it never had to worry about in reality.

Basically, if the Mosquito FB.VI should be perked due to its speed, there is a whole bevy of aircraft ahead of it on that list.

I can see the Mosquito B.MkXVI as a cheap perk bomber.

Mark Luper ,

I know what you mean.  There are people who really like each aircraft, some have more fans than others, but what really seems to determine if an aircraft is heavily used is how many non-fans wil use it.  I know there are dedicate P-47 fliers in AH (I even grab one once in a while), but if you look at its numbers they are not very high.  I would fly the Mosquito FB.VI Series 2 in preference over any aircraft in AH, but I don't think it will be a common aircraft.  There are P-40 people waiting in the wings as well.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline CyranoAH

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2304
The problem with overblown expectaions of future units & other thoughts
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2001, 04:12:00 AM »
Hmm nobody mentioned the cat?

Can we have the Catalina pleeeeez? pretty pretty pleeeez?   :D

Daniel, aka Cyrano