Author Topic: Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?  (Read 2277 times)

Offline Puff

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 69
      • http://www.massivestudios.net/ah
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« on: August 23, 2004, 10:57:18 AM »
I've heard rumors of a B29 in the works... anyone have any other info?

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2004, 10:59:17 AM »
B-29 makes no sense from a "gameplay" perspective. would add absolutely nothing to the game.

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12785
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2004, 11:11:22 AM »
nope no b29 at all, just a rumor
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Adogg

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2004, 11:33:22 AM »
Think: Boulton Turret as per Pyro's hint.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2004, 12:00:51 PM »
Pyro was making a joke based on a Defiant joke posted in a prior thread by a player.  Pyro even went so far as to say something to the effect of "I thought everyone knew the new fighter was a Defiant" in the thread he made his joke.  This was a day or so before the Ki-84 screenies were posted.

The fact is that no clues have been given as to what the bomber is.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Adogg

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2004, 12:22:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Pyro was making a joke based on a Defiant joke posted in a prior thread by a player.  Pyro even went so far as to say something to the effect of "I thought everyone knew the new fighter was a Defiant" in the thread he made his joke.  This was a day or so before the Ki-84 screenies were posted.

The fact is that no clues have been given as to what the bomber is.


pssst Karnak ... was casting a lure. but thanks bud.:aok

Offline NoBaddy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2943
      • http://www.damned.org
Re: Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2004, 01:48:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Puff
I've heard rumors of a B29 in the works... anyone have any other info?


The info that I have says the rumors you have heard are incorrect. :)
NoBaddy (NB)

Flying since before there was virtual durt!!
"Ego is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2004, 02:00:42 PM »
Hot damn!  Check "NEWS" !!!!



[edited to add the screenshot]




Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7255
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2004, 02:09:35 PM »
Nice pic Westy - is that IL2 or CFS3? :rolleyes:

If I were to put money on a bet, I would guess a late war model of the He-111 or Do-17.
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2004, 02:15:08 PM »
The worst bomber they could do would be B29 or B24.

We need:

Late war LW bomber: Ju188 or He177

Early war brit light or medium: Blenheim

Mid war russian medium: Pe2

The only US bomber of use might be an early B25.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2004, 03:30:05 PM »
Surely you meant "Wellington Mk III", but you accidentally typed "Blenheim" GRUNHERZ.

Bleinheim would be pointless for both scenarios and the MA.  Might as well suggest the Battle.  The Wellington brings a usable war load and some defensive guns while still being slow enough to be intercepted with ease by the Bf109E-4 and Bf110C-4b.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SunKing

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3726
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2004, 03:46:03 PM »
Since I'm a gambler.

I'll put all my perks on the He-111

VWE

  • Guest
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2004, 03:52:32 PM »
Quote
B-29 makes no sense from a "gameplay" perspective. would add absolutely nothing to the game.


Makes about as much sense as having an La-7 for the masses but charging perkies for a Spit 14...

So when do we get this B-29? :D

Offline Kevin14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2004, 03:54:52 PM »
He-111 would be quite teh 4w3s0me

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Rumors of new Bomber? Can anyone Confirm?
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2004, 04:01:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Surely you meant "Wellington Mk III", but you accidentally typed "Blenheim" GRUNHERZ.

Bleinheim would be pointless for both scenarios and the MA.  Might as well suggest the Battle.  The Wellington brings a usable war load and some defensive guns while still being slow enough to be intercepted with ease by the Bf109E-4 and Bf110C-4b.


No I meant Blenheim. Fairy Battle is another great choice though.