Author Topic: F4u-1, F4u-1c  (Read 917 times)

Offline memnon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« on: August 26, 2004, 02:43:51 PM »
Been doing some research and found that the F4U-1A and the F4U-1C both had wing tanks 62 gallons each. I know that in AH1 they had them and i am wondering why in AH2 they do not. Why were the wing tanks removed from these aircraft? Will they be put back in?

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6559
      • Aces High Events
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2004, 02:50:15 PM »
As I recall the F4U-1C did not have wing tanks.  It was identical to the F4U-1D except the guns (with whatever wight difference that may impose).

I should clarify... the F4U-1C did not have fuel tanks in the wings in AH1 as I recall.
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline AcId

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1090
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2004, 03:30:16 PM »
furthermore the F4U-1 in AH2 does have wing tanks, you may just not be loading enough fuel to where they are needed.

Offline memnon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2004, 03:39:04 PM »
I will check again tonight.

Offline Howitzer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1579
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2004, 04:14:40 PM »
I know for sure that AH1, the F4u1-C didn't have the wing tanks, just the 1 main tank.  I remember this because I recall cussing up a storm when I look down and I'm out of fuel with 9+ kills on board =)   The F4u1 also seems to be a bit more sluggish than the C and D models, but maybe thats just me...

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2004, 05:49:20 PM »
Soulyss is correct about F4U-1C is identical to F4U-1D
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline memnon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2004, 03:00:38 AM »
In AH2 the F4U-1C is identical to the F4U-1D but the research that i have done indicate's that the -1C should be a -1A with 20mm's (fuselage tank and wing tanks).

Referance Material America's hundred thousand

If i'm wrong please tell me where i can find out.

I know alot of you guys are deep into the facts and figures of all the aircraft and i'm just starting to get into that info and so all i'm doing is pointing out and asking at the same time a mistake that i think i have found.

Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2004, 06:53:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Howitzer
I know for sure that AH1, the F4u1-C didn't have the wing tanks, just the 1 main tank.  I remember this because I recall cussing up a storm when I look down and I'm out of fuel with 9+ kills on board =)   The F4u1 also seems to be a bit more sluggish than the C and D models, but maybe thats just me...



Howitzer,

burn off wing tanks 1st, bringem down to 25% or less(if u can)
 before u get into fights. this will increase ur roll rate alot.


whels

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2004, 07:38:15 AM »
Quote
In AH2 the F4U-1C is identical to the F4U-1D but the research that i have done indicate's that the -1C should be a -1A with 20mm's (fuselage tank and wing tanks).

Referance Material America's hundred thousand

I brought this up years ago.  I think the general concensus is that AHT is wrong.

Offline AcId

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1090
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2004, 08:46:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by whels
Howitzer,

burn off wing tanks 1st, bringem down to 25% or less(if u can)
 before u get into fights. this will increase ur roll rate alot.


whels



What whels said, but if you can, leave a little fuel in the right wing and this will lessen the abruptness of a stall in a turn and make it a lot more manageable. With an empty left wing and a little in the right you will out maneuver the C & D easily plus the -1 is a little faster.

I flew the -1 exclusively for many tours and it can be a very deadly machine in the right hands. Just don't get below a better turning foe

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2004, 10:51:56 AM »
The -1C is the -1D with 20mills.

The question I have are why does the F4U-1C have less hard points on it's wings 4 instead of 6.

« Last Edit: August 27, 2004, 10:54:25 AM by F4UDOA »

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8804
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2004, 01:56:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by F4UDOA
The -1C is the -1D with 20mills.

The question I have are why does the F4U-1C have less hard points on it's wings 4 instead of 6.



Dean does clearly state that the F4U-1C had greater internal fuel capacity (as did the F4U-1A) than the F4U-1D. Dean repeats this several times and provides basic charts as to this. I lean towards Dean because of his extensive collection of data and huge list of F4U references. I have other sources here that agree with Dean. It seems that the F4U-1C was simply a re-armed F4U-1A, which probably explains why the HTC version has less hard points.

Besides, the first F4U-1C was accepted 8 months before the first F4U-1D was accepted (August 1943, versus April 1944). This correlates to early F4U-1A production....

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline justin_g

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2004, 02:40:10 PM »
Quote
The question I have are why does the F4U-1C have less hard points on it's wings 4 instead of 6.


I think I might have it figured.

F4U-1D normal loaded weight: 12175lbs
F4U-1C normal loaded weight: 12470lbs

Difference is 295lbs of extra weight, placed on the wings.

5" HVAR weight: 140lbs

Take away the ability to carry 2 HVAR's and you take away a load of 280lbs from the wing, meaning that the maximum possible load on the wing stays about the same as the F4U-1D.

Navy doesn't have to do any testing to see if the wing could safely take the extra weight with a maximum loadout on the F4U-1C.

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2004, 02:44:27 PM »
F4U-1C was later got couple problems with their 20mm MG and they told the US Navy that their 4 x 20mm MG have been frozen when they reach above or higher at 10,000.  US Navy orders them all pilots who flew F4U-1C, they have to stay at 5,000 until they get the heater for their 20mm MG.
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline Howitzer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1579
F4u-1, F4u-1c
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2004, 03:10:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AcId
What whels said, but if you can, leave a little fuel in the right wing and this will lessen the abruptness of a stall in a turn and make it a lot more manageable. With an empty left wing and a little in the right you will out maneuver the C & D easily plus the -1 is a little faster.

I flew the -1 exclusively for many tours and it can be a very deadly machine in the right hands. Just don't get below a better turning foe


Cool!  I'll have to try it out!  Thanks for the input guys.