Author Topic: I like the P-38. Anyone else?  (Read 545 times)

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #30 on: January 07, 2001, 07:38:00 AM »
   
Quote
Originally posted by Beurling:
Hmm i thought i read in a earlier thred that 3g's at low speed was best in a low speed turn.

Once you are below corner speed, you get the best turn rate, and smallest radius by flying along the stall line, that's the left most line on those diagrams. The higher up that line the better, the snag is of course that none of the aircraft can sustain a higher position on that curve than the point where the sustained turn rate curve joins it.

If you check the Spitfire curve, you see it has a 5g stall speed of 200mph, a 4g stall speed just under 180mph and a 3g stall speed close to 155mph. The turn rate is better the higher you go, up to corner speed, but the highest SUSTAINED turn rate is where you said, 2.8g at 150mph.

 
Quote
Where the lines intersect is cv for the planes?

Corner velocity, is the highest point on the curves for each aircraft, the apex if you like, and for the aircraft on those diagrams you can see it is:

P-38L = 273
P-51  = 260
F6F   = 233
Spit  = 219

Generally, a lower corner speed implies better instantaneous turning performance. So ranking the aircraft above in order, gives:

1) Spit
2) F6F
3) P-51
4) P-38

The P-38 is last! Now if you use the diagrams above to look at the difference between the Spitfire and the P-38... You see a very large difference. Especially when you consider that current thinking among real fighter pilots is that any more than a two degrees per second sustained turn rate advantage would be decisive.

   
Quote
The spit turns best at 15o mph with around 2.8 g's?

That's its best sustained turn rate, with 25% fuel, no wep, and no flaps.

   
Quote
Ive been wondering about this because ive been trying 3 g's at 150 mph. I felt some times there was more turn rate left.

In the configuration I've quoted above, you can't pull 3g at 150mph, unless you use the wep or drop the flaps, or fly around in circles until you get lighter    

   
Quote
I would love to see 51 vs 38 with flaps.

So would I, and I'll be doing diagrams that include flap deployment later on, at which time I'll be able to do numerous overlays. Unfortunately these things take time, and that's one comodity I'm short of right now    

Personally, I've always been interested in the P-38 v Spitfire because I've often read the opinion that they would have been evenly matched. Indeed, I've seen many folk make quite vocal claims for the superiority of the P-38... But not in Aces High    


Leon "Badboy" Smith


[This message has been edited by Badboy (edited 01-07-2001).]
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline Jimdandy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #31 on: January 07, 2001, 08:28:00 AM »
Personally, I've always been interested in the P-38 v Spitfire because I've often read the opinion that they would have been evenly matched. Indeed, I've seen many folk make quite vocal claims for the superiority of the P-38... But not in Aces High    


Leon "Badboy" Smith


[This message has been edited by Badboy (edited 01-07-2001).][/B][/QUOTE]

I'd have to make a pitch for the 38 vs the Spit on AH. I've flown the 38 on the ragged edge vs the Spit high and low and it's close. I think the Spit edges out just a bit but in a dog fight with distraction and the like it the edge wares down. Now straight 1 vs 1 If no one makes a mistake, equal standing at the beginning of the fight and all that, I think the Spit will win out by a small margin on AH.

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #32 on: January 07, 2001, 11:33:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Jimdandy:
Now straight 1 vs 1 If no one makes a mistake, equal standing at the beginning of the fight and all that, I think the Spit will win out by a small margin on AH.

The Spitfire should win by a very comfortable margin. If you are having success against the Spitfire from a Co-E merge, I can only think that you must be very fortunate with the quality of your opponents  


Leon "Badboy" Smith
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline -duma-

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #33 on: January 07, 2001, 11:40:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by LePaul:
And, since its a twin engine aircraft, its a bigger target for bomber tailgunners to shoot at.

Never tailsit a bomber in the P38. It's a great, stable platform for vertical attacks, with a good climbrate. Go for the vertical attack every time and you'll rack up bomber kills with the close convergence of the guns.


Offline ispar

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
      • http://None :-)
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #34 on: January 07, 2001, 02:02:00 PM »
The P-38 is my favorite plane of all time, and always seems to get a bad a bad rap. It really bugs me when people insist that it is inferior. I'm not going to go into that argument though.

Anyway, it has been my favorite ride in AH since I first started. The Hellcat is beginning to supersede it though, primarily because it seems to be more accurately modeled. Now, don't get me wrong; it's beyond a shadow of a doubt the best modeled Lightning I've flown in any sim. It's climb and dive, etc. feel fine. The only thing that bothers me is its turn and spin characteristics.

Regardless, it's a very good all around plane in the MA. I'm not going to bother asking for it to be fixed; I honestly don't know if it is wrong. And the firepower has been fixed eh? I better give it another try.  

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
I like the P-38. Anyone else?
« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2001, 07:57:00 PM »
BadBoy,

First another outstanding job on the charts again!!

Second before you do any charts including flaps please take this into consideration.

The flaps in AH do not provide enough lift. They are equally ineffective on all birds that use them for the purpose of maneuvering or lowering landing speed. This includes the P-38, F6F, F4U and P-51 which I have tested again RL 1G stall data. Based on that I would have doubts as to there actual effect on pulling G and maneuvering.

What would really be interesting is a comparison between RL turn data and AH turn data. That would be compelling.

Now if they would just fix the flaps!!