Smaller Maps? Yay or Nay

[Kratzer]

Hey Nuttz -

I keep hearing how cool your terrains are... sorry if this has been asked and answered -

are there some terrains out there that you have done which can be used for h2h games?

Thanks,

------------------
Kratzer
Geschwader Kommodore
LuftJägerKorps

 

[This message has been edited by Kratzer (edited 02-15-2001).]

[NUTTZ]

Putting touches on them now,,, the new TE was released and we needed to go back to our old maps and retouch up some things. Besides all my maps were working while playing, that compounded some problems even more. Good news: I revamped all my maps ( new tiles, new elevations,ports,fixed feilds)... Bad news: be aleast 2 weeks before they ready.

NUTTZ
 

Originally posted by Kratzer:
Hey Nuttz -

I keep hearing how cool your terrains are... sorry if this has been asked and answered -

are there some terrains out there that you have done which can be used for h2h games?

Thanks,

[snafu]

Lerger. Definately (Much larger).   I don't think it would affect furballs much. They will always be fairly close to the front line fields on a really large map. (It might even help concentrate them if the majority of the fields where a considerable flight time away). It would also help restrict fighters to more forward fields (Apart from defensive duties) and mean that bombers would be nearer operating alt before crossing into enemy territory, while giving fighters more time to climb to intercept and imposing realistic fuel restrictions on the bomber escorts.

Just my opinion)  

TTFN
snafu

[Hooligan]

smaller