Originally posted by Ripsnort
Hehehehehe! Time for those tinfoil hats, Kappa, Nash
Run from this thread with my tail between my legs? You are extraordinarily dense is the only conclusion I can draw.
Dude - it's your side that's wearin' the hats.
No - this document can't be real, it's gotta be one giant conspiracy.
And it doesn't matter how irrelevant (a son says it'd be out of character), or untrue (you can't do "th's" back then) the charges are, or how many holes continue to get punched into this conspiracy theory, you'll never accept that this document just is what it is.
Just like you'll never believe a thing about Kerry's service to your country unless it paints him as an enemy to your country.
Wingnut s'all I can say.
Just so we're on the same page, there exists not one scrap of evidence that proves that these documents are fake. You have to concede that. It's just a bunch of junk experiments like matching computers to typewriters and speculative jabbering.
Which was always the point of the "forgery" accusers. The signal to noise ratio is so messed up now that the only thing anyone will really be able to recall about the whole thing was that it had something to do with typewriter balls.
So once again - good job.
Swift Boats & Typewriter Balls - the Story of the 2004 Election. Democracy in action, yegads.
Toad - What do you think of my answer to your question about the Bush file, regarding seperate entries one of which was typed in '68? You wouldn't say that the document that debunks the fraud charge is also a fraud, would you? My God! Forgeries everywhere you look! All lies! LIES I tell you!