If you love the corsair, you fly the TRUE one.
If you love the 190, you fly the TRUE one, not the plane that was only produced to the tune of 700 or so and was used mainly as base defense for 262's.
I dont care why does Chog have so much kills. I know that it ammouts for 20% of the arena kills, and I know the nik ammounts for 15%. Two planes in this GAME are getting 35% of the kills. And the tendence, instead of getting better, gets worse.
Don't let facts get in your way, your agenda is clear. My stats indicate I do much better in the German gear than in the American stuff. How do you explain that? To say that the number of sorties and the purpose of those sorties are unimportant tells me you are hardly unbiased.
I agree that Chog is not the best plane in the set. But I dont care, HTC (pyro) said clearly that their standards for perking planes were to avoid unballancing the main arena. IMO the Nik and Chog DO unballance the arena.
And I respect your opinion, though I don't share it.
Of course its up to HTC to:
1-redefine their policy of perking
2-say the Chog and N1k2 aren't unballancing the main arena.
3. ignore the whole issue. You haven't proven anything as far as I can tell.
But as it is, this is annoying as hell. And no, I wont have more fun flying in 109F4 or C202, you know why?
Why not? I thought you wanted people to take more of a challenge? Why not be a leader by example and challenge yourself?
because in any plane I fly I will keep on seeing seas of niks and chogs.
What about the P-38's, 109's, Spits, P-51's, 190's, B-17's, Lancs... we must be playing different games, because I see about everything out there. There are areas that are guaranteed 1C magnets (ground attack, CV's) but aside from that I see more stangs and 109's than anything else.
You contradict yourself much. You want more of a challenge (for others apparently), but you won't try to do something different. You want to legislate us into planes that you can kill more easily in your ride of choice.