Quite shocking to see how people would react to some of mere "suggestions", it seems. Somehow this little suggestion I made has been caught between things beyond my knowledge(or power I guess) - like the ongoing battle between "pro-amerikaners" and "anti-amerikaners".
As I stated before, the information I got was from a historian, and his credibility to my judgement seemed acceptable enough. Sort of makes me wonder - the levels of hostility from those "elites" who can quote some astounding things against a "dweeb" like me.
Dunno, I myself never claimed which thing/gun was better. The debate was long hot before I ever started this post. I inquired about it, got an answer and made a (naive perhaps?) suggestion which might present some negotiable solution between these "warring" factions. Why, it even smells like some of you people are suggesting that we all have to have near-encyclopedic knowledge about aircraft from A to Z to make one, single, small, short sentenced, damn suggestion. If one "hears a story" and "says something about it" without "he himself having encyclopedic knowledge" one does get branded the bad bad mark, no? (Well, for one thing, I never knew that the ' " ' quotation mark was supposed to be used for quoting 'books' exclusively. Have they changed something about grammar thingies? Well if one might ask a clarification on this matter, I inquired it via little something called 'e-mail' and he answered it on a public messageboard we use. I read that, didn't I?)
--
Well, anyway, it seems the two "factions" are each asking for data and facts. They both show the facts and both claim each other's facts aren't acceptable. Real-life pilot's stories are just stories and can't be trusted. Fine, then who do we trust? I myself often thought the statistics on "paper" never were truthful to the real life, too. Why bother even asking each other for "facts" when you guys aren't gonna listen to each other anyway?
--
What I still wanna know(and what you guys still haven't answered, not even giving it a bit of consideration since you guys are so busy warring each other about who's the more "Brains" about aircraft knowledge) is..
would putting in some gun jams or lowering the gun accuracy of notorious planes just a little teensey bit affect the game play so much that you guys who love the chog wanna give the whole thing up and shout "you anti-American conspirators!" ?
wouldn't modeling gun jams increase the tension and stimulation of gameplay to tolerable limits(if putting it in only "book-claimed" chog 20mms or Hispanos seems too unfair, how about putting it generally?)?
..
