Hmm maybe I used the wrong word. English is not my 1st language.
Hindsight is not the word to use to describe 'looking back at what already happened and making believe that if it was you then and there you wouldve made a different decision because NOW you know the results of that decision" ?
Kerry is claiming he wouldve not done the bad decisions he claims bush did back then because he now knows the results of it.
Its ok to confront someone with the results of their decisions, even rub their noses in it.
But to claim that he wouldve done a much better job at it only because now he has the benefit of knowing the effects of such decisions is just..well, lets just say that for me that shows me a very ugly side of Kerry's character, one that is most definetely not what I would look for in a leader. Inspires no trust or respect or credibility to his actions and motives.
Bush in my view has a much better character as a leader. More importantly, he's a leader that takes action when its needed and not when others think its needed.
Kerry has as good as stated that if it was him in the chief's chair instead of bush , saddam would still be in charge of iraq, al-queda would still be in afghanistan, the UN wouldve still be debating how to word their next toothless resolution, etc etc.
Kerry wouldve turned the US into another France.
brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
