Author Topic: Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?  (Read 1407 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #60 on: September 23, 2004, 11:57:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Americans perhaps.


I'd like to see what America could to to desreve such treatment, really...

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #61 on: September 24, 2004, 12:29:26 AM »
Nah.... I still think Mr. Stevens overplayed his hand.

Gotta be consequences... and the sum total of the punishment he's received isnt a big deal considering....

Offline RTStuka

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 869
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #62 on: September 24, 2004, 03:03:16 PM »
I had a college professor who was detained for 44 days when he tried to enter the United States because he had been arrested at an Anti-War demonstration in japan. Choichiro Yatani, who is a doctor in psychology and studied at Stony brook Institute was coming back to the U.S. after attending an international academic conference. He had been invited to the conference to give a speech on a paper we wrote that delt with antinuclear activism. When he tried to enter the country he was told his visa had been revoked and that he was not allowed in. 44 days later he was released, it was a pretty amazing story to hear.


The reason I post this is that here is a guy who had done a whole lot less then Mr. Cat Stevens, so I think people need to realize that security comes at a cost.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #63 on: September 24, 2004, 03:30:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
This form of "security" is like copy protection on software. It doesn't really stop the criminals, only makes more problems for law-abiding citizens.


Agreed! We must do nothing and retreat like Europe, we will only win this war on islamic terrorists by inviting them into our countries and subsidizing their unproductive and undignified lives with government handouts derived from high taxes!!

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #64 on: September 24, 2004, 06:14:16 PM »
I heard on the news today they found the al-queda contact Cat Stevens was scheduled to meet with in the US. Dolly Parton. Even Colin Powell called the deportation "stupid".
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #65 on: September 24, 2004, 06:24:12 PM »
Well, Dolly has a set of missiles... And everyone's got their price.

Hell - I think we all just ducked a bullet.

Offline Chortle

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 419
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #66 on: September 24, 2004, 06:45:12 PM »
lol

Tit-for-Tat bannings are in order just like various diplomatic explusions. We get to keep the Cat so long as you promise to keep Timberlake and Britney.

Offline Gyro/T69

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #67 on: September 24, 2004, 07:04:07 PM »
Chortle, You are indeed evil  :) I know why the UK are upset. They were hoping to get rid of the dip.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #68 on: September 24, 2004, 07:14:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Nice rant. I suppose you think it's better to alienate even more people, especially your allies.



     Allies?  Wow, that's a stretch.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Glas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Cat Stevens, Threat to National Security?
« Reply #69 on: September 24, 2004, 07:22:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raubvogel
He contributed money to Hamas and we don't want him in our country. Simple as that. I think we still have a right to say who does and doesn't enter our country.


The point is, he has been tainted with the 'terrorism supporter' tag without any kind of trial, no chance to prove his innocence.

I would suggest people wrongly afflicted with such an accusation could sue the US for it.  But since the US recognises no law but its own (but likes to see all other wrongdoers tried by an international court, from which the US claims absolute immunity) there wouldnt be much point.

Is anyone missing the hypocrisy in this state of affairs?

Glas
JG13 Lokis Kinder