Author Topic: OMG Bush is crying (Read 2014 times)

bigsky · « **Reply #60 on:** October 01, 2004, 12:18:50 AM »

you guys watched that crap on tv. while bush and kerry debated i got a nap in. i win.

Drunky · « **Reply #61 on:** October 01, 2004, 12:29:01 AM »

Wow Nash. You seem super sensitive. While I scrolled down the posts you seem to be on average every second or third post.

Are you compensating for something?

[edit] 63 posts so far. 28 are Nash's. That's over 1/3.

Drunky · « **Reply #62 on:** October 01, 2004, 12:29:59 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by B17Skull12
SOB needs to die!

I would defend SOB with your life. and probably with several other people's lives too.

There. Take that you big meanie. Leave my SOB alone.

Nash · « **Reply #63 on:** October 01, 2004, 12:33:07 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Drunky
Are you compensating for something?

We were jabberin' throughout the debate. I know it must look weird after the debate ends.... but we all prolly ditched IRC ages ago, so here we are.

LePaul · « **Reply #64 on:** October 01, 2004, 12:56:53 AM »

I think it was one of those debates where those who like Bush will say he won...and Kerry supporters will say their guy won.

Kerry's weird stats ($200 billion spent when less than $120 billion has been spent......only the rich got tax cuts, yet the tax cuts cut rates for *all* taxpyers, etc etc) threw me. He seemed to "toss in" these jabs as the clock ticked down.

Then for Bush, he rambles a bit and is just tough to sit and listen to. I admire him for coming across as an average guy. But for goodness sake, show me you've rehearsed your responses. My Speech Teacher would've beat the "Umm's" out of him by now!

I like Bush, nothing really changed there. Kerry came off as lecturing at times.

Thrawn · « **Reply #65 on:** October 01, 2004, 02:19:11 AM »

I watched the debate down at my local. The concesus, "This is the best that the US can come up with?".

The solution, "Kick them both in the junk.".

Blooz,

"Bush has a plan too and his is working."

You are out of your ****ing mind, at least to all the people that are employed to make such assessments.

Steve · « **Reply #66 on:** October 01, 2004, 02:31:35 AM »

Nash, I'm just busting your chops, buddy.

Yes, I think you're whacko for supporting Kerry, but I still luv ya.

Take a shot at this: How is Kerry "viable" about Iraq?

Thrawn · « **Reply #67 on:** October 01, 2004, 02:38:48 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Take a shot at this: How is Kerry "viable" about Iraq?

Heh, Kerry has a plan (as ill founded it may or may not be) for turning around the circumstances there. What's Bush's? Things are getting worse and worse. What is the projected out come of "staying this course"? What's Bush's solution to it?

Steve · « **Reply #68 on:** October 01, 2004, 02:41:10 AM »

Quote

Kerry has a plan (as ill founded it may or may not be) for turning around the circumstances there.

What is this plan?

Thrawn · « **Reply #69 on:** October 01, 2004, 02:54:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
What is this plan?

What Steven, some Canukian moron can find this but you, who can actually vote for or against this tard, can't?

http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/national_security/iraq.html

Nilsen · « **Reply #70 on:** October 01, 2004, 03:13:16 AM »

From what ive seen so far (watching rerun now), "we" need two new contestants.

Eagler · « **Reply #71 on:** October 01, 2004, 05:23:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Bush almost broke down and WEPT!

yeah

when describing his meeting of the fallens soldiers wife and son, Bush should have laughed and smiled... stupid Bush

some of you are so far up skerries arse, you don't even know that your "war hero" just got the crap kicked out of him .. WITH HIS OWN WORDS!!

LOL LOL LOL

LANDSLIDE BUSH!!!!!

Preon1 · « **Reply #72 on:** October 01, 2004, 05:27:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nilsen
From what ive seen so far (watching rerun now), "we" need two new contestants.

That'll happen next week when Cheney swallows that pansy from NC whole.

After sleeping on the debate, my mind hasn't changed. Kerry won on points. If swing voters saw teary eyes instead some other cause to the blinking, Kerry will gain some ground. Personally, I don't think anybody is going to run a story saying 'Bush cried' (ESPECIALLY since he didn't try to wipe anything out of his eyes).

Kerry did better in the debate then Bush, but it won't win him much when the effect filters down through the electoral college.

All told, I think Kerry's 'constant' position is indefensible. He approved of the war in Iraq, but not how it was prosecuted because Bush didn't pull together more allies, yet he would never allow another country to decide when we go to war. If I understand him correctly, then I don't like his logic.

Gixer · « **Reply #73 on:** October 01, 2004, 05:35:16 AM »

I don't really care much for Kerry either, but Bush has to be the worst public speaker in politics. He really does seem to have no idea at all on how to answer questions or carry a debate.

If it had been a proper debate where they could question each other and away with all the rules it really would of been something to watch.

Just amazes me how someone that is so bad at public speaking can be in politics in the first place let alone president.

~~...-Gixer~~

mosgood · « **Reply #74 on:** October 01, 2004, 06:49:06 AM »

Again, I think George did great. We have always known that he wasn't a good speaker.

So.. fine... Kerry wins the "best debate performance" catagory

but on substance I think George took him down. GW was on the defense most of the time but I think that he didn't give any ground.

btw... I'm not a GWB fan but Kerry didn't give any reasons why HE should be president besides that he'll work hard and that he has this nebulus miracle plan that will save the world.