« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Planes Vs. Armor  (Read 705 times)

Offline JB14

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Planes Vs. Armor
« on: October 04, 2004, 01:07:54 PM »
htc you have done a good job of making it a tad* harder to kill gvs with planes/mgs. However, just last night i was in a panzer crusing along and a nik desides to shoot me. It only took him 3 straiffs to make me "BLOW UP". Now i belive that planes with 20mm should not be able to make a tank BLOW UP.!!!!!!

My request it that instead of making planes, like the nik blow up panzers/tanks, make them be able to only DISABLE them, NOT BLOW THEM UP!.......... only planes that are made for that job be able to make them blow up, such as the 110,il2, and so on......

Its kinda lame how your just rolln along and some nik straiffs you a few times and u blow up.

ty just my opinion.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2004, 01:10:06 PM by JB14 »
Logged

Offline Raider179

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2004, 01:22:35 PM »
Agreed. No tank should be able to be killed by mg. Cannon maybe some damage but no death especially from 20s. How bout adding partial engine dmg. say you can only move half speed? or transmition dmg no 2nd gear/reverse whatever? One dmg I havent seen but think it would be great would be radio dmg. You lose your com unit. Think it would be great.
Logged

Offline JB14

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2004, 01:29:52 PM »
ya somthing like that :aok
Logged

Offline FuBaR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 671
TRUE
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2004, 01:51:53 PM »
I couldnt agree more. Even if i am doing the straffing it feels unacceptably cheap.


btw this is FuBaR;
Logged

Offline Furious

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
Re: Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2004, 02:45:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB14
...Its kinda lame how your just rolln along and some nik straiffs you a few times and u blow up...

Is that the same kind of lame as a bunch of jb's using 110's to strafe down the fleets?
Logged

Offline xHaMmeRx

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
      • http://www.netaces.org
Re: Re: Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2004, 02:52:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furious
Is that the same kind of lame as a bunch of jb's using 110's to strafe down the fleets?


:rofl
Logged

Offline JB14

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2004, 03:03:23 PM »
hmm remind me the last time we did that? cause usually we use eggs with the 110s for that purpose. Would take a long time to strafe cvs down. 2 1k bombs work just fine

:o
« Last Edit: October 04, 2004, 03:07:16 PM by JB14 »
Logged

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2004, 04:02:11 PM »
The "blow up" effect that you see, could be due to the fact that your driver/pilot has been killed rather than the physical vehicle blowing up ... same code as when the pilot of a plane is killed.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline FuBaR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 671
AMEN FURIOUS
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2004, 04:39:33 PM »
THIS IS NOT A WHINE

When lancasters,b17s...and so on.... fly ON THE DECK and suicide bomb the EVERYTHING(also CVs) it is just plain ridiculous. PLEASE do something about this easy way for MORONS to succeed strategy




        LOVE, FuBaR
Logged

Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2004, 08:42:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB14
hmm remind me the last time we did that? cause usually we use eggs with the 110s for that purpose. Would take a long time to strafe cvs down. 2 1k bombs work just fine

:o



long time?????? 2 110Gs 1 pass each CV is ded  using
guns only.
Logged

Offline JB14

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2004, 11:05:34 PM »
ya i do agree that that shouldnt be possible. only eggs should destroy cvs. htc GET TO WORK !
:D :rofl :lol
Logged

Offline FuBaR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 671
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2004, 01:01:03 AM »
HOW about making a higher alt to arm bombs




 DOES ANYONE LIKE THIS IDEA
Logged

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2004, 03:30:05 AM »
yea as a tank driver i would love to see more then 5-6 parts on a tank and wtf is up with when they take out ur track y u go lopsided and it would be nice to see a hull gun get takin out or if ur turret gets hit at a certain place u can still fire it but u cant turn it and like raider said if u get hit in the transmition what ever gear u were in thats the only gear u have and if its a high gear it takes u longer to get up to speed.
Logged

Offline FuBaR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 671
IDEA
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2004, 05:32:53 PM »
Here is an idea of mine.

all buffs(b17s..26s..lancs..etc......) should have a higher bomb activation alttitude. i would say 10k...(unless using torps)


for ground attack planes i say 2k.


      LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK
Logged

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Planes Vs. Armor
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2004, 06:56:45 PM »
fubar there was like 2 or 3 other posts that was talkin bout the same thing ur talkin bout but if u do that then y not make it so that lalas and yaks cant go past 10k cuz russins faught at low alts and y cant we pack our zekes with HE and ram in to ships
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »