Originally posted by rpm
Bush did much better than last time, but I got to give Kerry the edge again.
On a technicall level Kerry seemed to have the edge, But bush seemed to just come out stronger because he was so comfortable and really seemed to be at home. Content wise I think they both spouted the same things we heard for the past few months, I didnt hear anything I didnt expect to hear. So frankly I think that this debate came down too who sounded better and didnt sound like he was in a trial and I think bush Won that. I do think Kerry did a good job as far as being very straight forward and being direct but it sounded way too planned. This kind of set up allowed for bushes poor poor public speaking skills to work in his advantage because he seemed more down to earth.
EDIT: Why do they have to go and interview these stupid brainwashed morons after the debates. First they go too one of the campaign idiots then they go to the other sides idiot. I mean whats the point all they are going to say is "OH he dominated, he did great, hes awesome, hes better than him." Do these guys have to sign papers that allow them to be bent over a chair and spanked repeadetly from their respective party.