Author Topic: Presidential Debate #2 Debate  (Read 4774 times)

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #195 on: October 09, 2004, 12:34:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by NUKE
Then you backed Kerry when he voted to use force in Iraq? You backed Kerry when he said that he was glad Saddam was out of power and that the Iraq war was the right thing to do?

You back Kerry when he says he thinks it's wrong to send troops into Iraq without  proper equipment, then votes against funding the troops?


He voted to give Bush authorization however Bush as the president has 60 days to do whatever he wants militarly. Bush presented his case then carried out his plans.

I think Kerry covered that in the debate today. he said he wanted the people to pay for it and not pass it along to the next generation. Sounds reasonable. Maybe what Bush is doing seems so great because everything he does is being passed on to the next generation.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2004, 12:43:21 AM by MrCoffee »

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #196 on: October 09, 2004, 12:36:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrCoffee
He voted to give Bush authorization however Bush as the president has 60 days to do whatever he wants militarly. Bush presented his case then carried out his plans.

Second issue, Kerry covered that himself in the debate today. he said he wanted the people to pay for it and not pass it along to the next generation. Sounds reasonable. Maybe what Bush is doing seems so great because everything he does is being passed on to the next generation.


ummmm, okay.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #197 on: October 09, 2004, 12:37:59 AM »
I think it was a close debate and these numbers are very early. Give it a day or 2 and we will see if either gained any ground. The guys screaming "Landslide Bush" either didn't watch the debate or didn't pay attention. There was no clear win by either candidate tonight.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #198 on: October 09, 2004, 12:38:56 AM »
Dont mean to be bashing on Bush so much. I just got back from starbucks.

:D

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #199 on: October 09, 2004, 12:43:37 AM »
for those posting 'poll' results from internet votes and such about who won...heres one from AOL

Who won the debate?
John Kerry 52%
George Bush 48%
Which ticket is faring better in the debates overall?
Kerry-Edwards 54%
Bush-Cheney 46%
Total Votes: 357,537


completely unscientific but i'd call it pretty damn square.  I saw Kerry foundering tonight, he always talked about his plan.  He only talked about his plan.  In fact, I'm starting to get sick of the word plan.  When it comes right down to it and Joe American is standing in the voting booth, he votes for his gut instinct on who he thinks is best.  Best of luck to both sides but for the sake of America...vote Bush.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #200 on: October 09, 2004, 12:44:33 AM »
There was no "clear" win...

But there was a big, big, huge win nonetheless. The kind of win where folks suddenly think something, but have no idea why.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #201 on: October 09, 2004, 12:49:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
There was no "clear" win...

But there was a big, big, huge win nonetheless. The kind of win where folks suddenly think something, but have no idea why.

Too true. I think this one may have some long term effect.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #202 on: October 09, 2004, 12:51:07 AM »
Who liked Kerry's response to the question, what would you do if Iran didn't respond to sanctions? In fact , who can transalate what he said? I heard, " well I'd talk to other countries and I'd get tough on them." Anyone actually hear his plan? I 'm serious, I missed it. I know his response was 90% another issue and only the last couple of sentences had to do with Iran - and they said nothing. I guess that counts as a "I dunno." But that Iran thing is a real problem in the next 4 years.

In fact I can you tell you many things Kerry says not to do, but other than talking to other countires in some type of coca cola commercial (I'd like to teach the world to sing....) I've heard NO PLAN.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #203 on: October 09, 2004, 12:53:36 AM »
Tweety... do you recall spending the last two weeks complaining like an old woman that you didn't understand a damn thing Bush was ever trying to say? "Convoluted" comes to mind.

Now you're saying it about Kerry...

Do you understand... anyone?

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #204 on: October 09, 2004, 12:55:56 AM »
Tweety, if you really want to look at his plans look at his website. He does have specific ideas on many subjects. I don't expect either candidate to lay out their detailed ideas in soundbites of 90 seconds or less.

« Last Edit: October 09, 2004, 12:58:21 AM by rpm »
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #205 on: October 09, 2004, 01:15:03 AM »
I asked about specific question, Nash. I didn't hear an answer.

Old women need love too :D

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #206 on: October 09, 2004, 01:20:05 AM »
Quote
His tax policy will not affect most small busineses. I cant remember exact figure but if I do I'll post it.
  [/B]


according to CNBC an independant think tank has the number effected at 400,000

Not the amount Bush claims, but still an AWFUL lot
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #207 on: October 09, 2004, 01:22:43 AM »
Also the same think tank has the number of lost jobs at 800,000 not the 1.5 million that kerry claims

They were doing a facts thing pointing out where each side had their numbers wrong.

Was actually pretty non partison imo
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #208 on: October 09, 2004, 01:37:47 AM »
Check this  article out concerning the tax cuts, who got em and who they help.  

Despite the spin, its not "just the wealthy" who got a break (albeit they do pay 67.7% of the tax burden)

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
Presidential Debate #2 Debate
« Reply #209 on: October 09, 2004, 01:57:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve
Don't get caught up in liberal speak.  You can only give tax breaks to people who actually pay taxes.


How do you justtify tax breaks when at the same time the biggest threat today is a wmd being snuck into the US or a harbor by means of shipping. Shouldnt those measures be taken cared of already. I think the argument was that it would be too expensive and would hike the tax up yet Bush is giving a tax break to the wealthiest. I guess they all live in monoco or some other place. As Spock from star Trek would say, thats illogical.

And the drugs from canada and blocking group drug buys here in the US that would make them cheaper for srs. That is just illogical as well. Who pays, the people.

Ok Im off the pres debate, I think I've said enough.

:lol