Anyone that believes Kerry is more fiscally responsible or savvy will deserve what they get should he win.
Originally posted by capt. apathy I had never heard of Kerry say he took part in war-crimes(maybe I missed it), just that he had seen them take place. but with Bush you get a guy who was indicted as a war criminal. IIRC the charges were filed in Japan and related to the use of DU rounds (basically our own version of the nuclear 'dirty weapon' we were wanned the enemy could use on us). as far as I've been able to tell he never answered the charges.
Originally posted by TheDudeDVant I find this statment extremely funny and .. well, it doesn't matter what else.. Considering Bush has run up the largest defecit in presidential history and increased the national debt more than ever in American history, I find it very hard to believe Kerry could do worse..
Originally posted by DREDIOCK Actually most financial experts beleive the both will do about the same
Originally posted by TheDudeDVant Most? I doubt that 'most' would want to speculate like that. Care to show 'some'??Its of little matter actually. It seems Bush has already proven he can spend more than any other before.. lmao
Originally posted by lazs2 any of you guys want any of your college profs to be president? How bout scientists? know any scientists that you think would make good presidents? lazs
Originally posted by lazs2 So...klinton did not finish the program so he really isn't a rhodes scholar after all? Not that I really want one running things anyway.... for the most part our politicians are not made up of scholars and scientists... for good reason.... scholars and scientists have their heads up their butts.To me it looks like klinton and Bush were doing about the same things but Bush was doing a better job. If you could stand to listen to him klinton was a better speaker tho.lazs