« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: B-25  (Read 845 times)

Offline tonyki61

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 167
B-25
« on: October 16, 2004, 09:23:12 PM »
The B-25 mitchell and it's variants would cool!
Logged

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
B-25
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2004, 09:57:20 PM »
how about a german bomber how about the HE-111 or the JU-52 we have to many allied bombers as it is and yet they made the B-24
Logged

Offline United

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
      • http://squadronspotlight.netfirms.com
B-25
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2004, 12:07:06 AM »
They made the B-24 to fill a gap in the upcoming ToD scenario.

My guess is that the next bomber is Russian.  There isnt a single Russian bomber other than the Il2, and its not much good for bombing static objects.

I'd bet the B-25 is very low on the priority list.
Logged

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
B-25
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2004, 04:38:35 AM »
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):

Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber
Logged

Offline Flyboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1582
B-25
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2004, 06:23:13 AM »
i want to see the He111 and the G4m betty
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
B-25
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2004, 07:37:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):

Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber


i would say british then german above italian.

Afterall the brits do only have the lancaster.  The boston is another american bomber just in RAF markings.  Its like having a B-26 in RAF markings and calling it a british bomber.  

At least the germans have the stuka and ju88 which are useful bombers.  A Wellington, Halifax BIII, Stirling or B. Mossie would be very nice.

I know the italians dont have any bombers.... but do we really need one?
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
B-25
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2004, 08:56:46 AM »
Hope you are not upset with me Furby for not agreeing with you.
Logged

Offline gear

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
B-25
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2004, 09:25:20 AM »
Type: Long Range Bomber or Reconnaissance aircraft.
Origin: Junkers Flugzeug und Motorenwerke AG
Models: V1 to V3 and A-1
Crew: N/A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine:
Model: BMW 801E
Type: 18-Cylinder two-row radial
Number: Six Horsepower: 1,970 hp

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 165 ft. 1 in. (50.30m)
Length: 112 ft. 2.5 in. (34.20m)
Height: 22 ft. 7 in. (6.89m)
Wing Surface Area: N/A

Weights:
Empty: 81,350 lb. (36,900 kg)
Loaded: 166,448 lb. (75,500 kg)
Performance:
Maximum Speed:
Clean: 314 mph (505 kph)
With Max. Eternal Weapons: 267 mph (430 kph)
Initial Climb: N/A
Service Ceiling (Typical): N/A
Range in Recce configuration:
6,027 miles (9700 km)
Endurance in Recce configuration: 32 Hours

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Eight 20mm MG 151.
Eight 13mm MG 131.

Payload:
Transport (V1): 22,046 lb. (10,000 kg)
Bomber (V3): 3,968 lb. (1800 kg)

Avionics:
FuG 200 Hohentwiel Radar.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2004, 09:27:42 AM by gear »
Logged

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
B-25
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2004, 09:54:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):

Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber



Does this include dutch bombers too? :D
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
B-25
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2004, 10:05:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
Hope you are not upset with me Furby for not agreeing with you.


HOW DARE YOU NOT AGREE WITH ME!!! YOU MUST DIE!!!

:D

what would a discussion be without differing opinions? :)
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
B-25
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2004, 11:20:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
HOW DARE YOU NOT AGREE WITH ME!!! YOU MUST DIE!!!

:D

what would a discussion be without differing opinions? :)


pheuu.. was worried there for a min. :D

But you do know that you are wrong right?
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
B-25
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2004, 11:32:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
pheuu.. was worried there for a min. :D

But you do know that you are wrong right?


about what?  needing a brit bomber? or not needing an italian one?  First thing we definately need is a russian bomber.

shouldnt you be asking for a new boat rather than bombers? ;) :D
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
B-25
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2004, 11:35:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
about what?  needing a brit bomber? or not needing an italian one?

shouldnt you be asking for a new boat rather than bombers? ;) :D


Yes we need a new boat before a bomber, but we also need more fighters before bombers.

back on topic.... You are wrong about most things most of the time when you are not in agreement with me.. does that cover it?  :D

good.
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
B-25
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2004, 11:48:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
back on topic.... You are wrong about most things most of the time when you are not in agreement with me.. does that cover it?  :D
 


what am i wrong about this time because i am not in agreement with you? maybe you are wrong, when you say i am wrong, about being wrong and not being in agreement with you - because i dont know what you are telling me i am wrong about?
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
B-25
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2004, 11:55:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
what am i wrong about this time because i am not in agreement with you? maybe you are wrong, when you say i am wrong, about being wrong and not being in agreement with you - because i dont know what you are telling me i am wrong about?


no no... this is real easy. pay attention:

you are always wrong when you dont agree with me. thats simple enough aint it? :cool:

situation 1) i say A and you say A then you are aok

situation 2) I say A and you say B then you are not ok...aok?

:p
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »