Author Topic: Bush Relatives for Kerry :)  (Read 936 times)

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2004, 10:44:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mighty1
Good thing this election is going to be different.

We don't even have to vote cause Kerry has already claimed victory!:rolleyes:


Maybe that's what their guidebook means by "preemptive".



Was it all just a dream? ;)
« Last Edit: October 25, 2004, 10:47:14 AM by AKIron »
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2004, 11:23:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKcurly
I believe abortion is the law of the land.  How can you fault someone for exercising their rights under the law?
curly


the law of the land once said you could own slaves.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2004, 11:31:25 AM »
If men carried babies for 9 months abortion wouldn't even be an issue. Of course it would be legal.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2004, 11:51:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
If men carried babies for 9 months abortion wouldn't even be an issue. Of course it would be legal.


You're implying that all women support abortion, they don't.

Favoring Abortion: Men Versus Women  
Situation Men Women
All or Most Cases 54% 58
To Save Woman's Life 88 88
To Save Woman's Health 82 83
In Cases of Rape/Incest 80 81
Physically Impaired Baby 53 55
To End Unwanted Pregnancy 43 40
D&X/Partial-Birth Abortions 28 19
Pregnancy is 6 Months+ 15 8
 
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/abortion_poll030122.html
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2004, 11:53:03 AM »
Nope, I'm implying that it would have always been legal because men made the rules.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2004, 11:53:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Nope, I'm implying that it would have always been legal because men made the rules.


Well, if men carried the babies they would be women and the numbers I posted would remain the same.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2004, 11:55:43 AM »
Party pooper.
 
What? No imagination?

Offline texace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
      • http://www.usmc.mil
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2004, 12:09:31 PM »
That's an interesting way to look at it...

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2004, 12:36:48 PM »
Well, if men remained the same other than carrying their progeny this would all be moot as humans would have ceased to exist long ago. Not because none would be willing to carry their own child but rather because the ability to have sex with yourself would have resulted in such over population that we would have all starved to death. ;)
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline texace

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
      • http://www.usmc.mil
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2004, 12:43:26 PM »
And now it all makes sense! :D:D

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #25 on: October 25, 2004, 12:54:03 PM »
I want to know where the constitution provides for the killing of the unborn?

I challenge anyone to find where this is provided for in the consitution.  When you find it and show it to me I will immediately revoke my hatred for all things liberal and vote for Kerry.

Bottom line is you will not be able to show me this.  What you will say is the supreme court interpreted the protection of a persons privacy as the basis for lawful infanticide.  

Kerry must not be given the opportunity to appoint anyone to the supreme court.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #26 on: October 25, 2004, 01:15:58 PM »
>>I want to know where the constitution provides for the killing of the unborn?
<<

What if the unborn is outside the uterus and not viable? Is there a right to kill it? Of course it will never make it to term, buts its alive when the pregnancy is terminated. What gives the doctor the right to terminate one life for another? Or do you think women with ectopic pregnancies should die? If not, should they be able to donate those fetuses to stem cell research?

A lot of politicians spouting off about medicine know little about either.

You brought up the subject, Yeager, now elaborate further than Archie Bunker type farting.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #27 on: October 25, 2004, 01:20:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TweetyBird
>>I want to know where the constitution provides for the killing of the unborn?
<<

What if the unborn is outside the uterus and not viable? Is there a right to kill it? Of course it will never make it to term, buts its alive when the pregnancy is terminated. What gives the doctor the right to terminate one life for another? Or do you think women with ectopic pregnancies should die? If not, should they be able to donate those fetuses to stem cell research?

A lot of politicians spouting off about medicine know little about either.

You brought up the subject, Yeager, now elaborate further than Archie Bunker type farting.


Yeager will do his own elaborating but I'd like to ask you how this unborn and unviable child got outside of the uterus?
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #28 on: October 25, 2004, 01:21:51 PM »
You need to consult some medical web pages - start with searching "ectopic pregnancy"

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13294
Bush Relatives for Kerry :)
« Reply #29 on: October 25, 2004, 01:24:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TweetyBird
You need to consult some medical web pages - start with searching "ectopic pregnancy"


Guess I don't need to since you've pointed it out. I'm not familiar with the term but am the condition. Anyhow, just to make my position clear, my objection to abortion is as performed as birth control.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.