Originally posted by john9001 10bears , you silly , john heinz-kerry has been saying Iraq was no threat, now he says it was such a big threat that bush should have sent in more troops to fight "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time".
Originally posted by lazs2 red bottom.... most wars are considered successful when the enemy can no longer raise an army.lazs
this is really funny.... Bush led probly(sic) the most sucessful (sic) and least expensive in American lives, war of all time and now some of you wussies (sic) are saying he didn't do enough? lazs
If they had any WMD at all it would be a couple of buckets of bug spray left over from ... well from when Reagan gave it to them in the 80’s.
Originally posted by Elfie It's already been shown that chemicals the US sold to Iraq were sold to them for agricultural uses. Some of the chemicals had a dual-use. None of the chemicals we sold them were critical ingredients for the manufacture of chemical weapons.We also sold Iraq Anthrax spores to use in making Anthrax vaccine for livestock.