This statement always annoys me:
"So my main point is this. Keeping the system cool will boost performance. "
Sigh.
The correct statement is:
"Keeping the system within is manufacturer-specified operational temperatures will allow it to perform as it was designed and intended."
Example: If a CPU has a rating of, say, 3 GHz and a Max temperatuire of 70 degrees C under load, and it is actually running at 55 degrees C under load in your system, IT WILL NOT BE FASTER IF YOU COOL THE CPU TO 50 or 45 degrees C.
On the other hand, if due to a cooling malfunction, or dust build-up, or exceedingly poor ventilation, this example CPU is running at 75 degrees C, then making it cooler would boost performance. BUT ONLY BECUASE SOMETHING WAS KEEPING IT OUT OF THE MANUFACTURER-SPECIFIED TEMP. RANGE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Keeping a system cooler than it would otherwise be at the specified operations level allows a tweaker to overclock, sometimes a little, and sometimes a lot. That's where exess cooling is important.
Heat DOES relate to crashes and system stability too, BUT, if your system has a "system temp" of 45 degreex C and it runs stable 100% of the time (within the realm of anything running Windows being 100% stable), getting the system temp down to 40 degrees will NOT make it "more stable." How can something be more stable than 100%?
It may allow you to overclock things like memory timing and system bus speed.
I know a lot of people who worry about system temps for no good reason: they aren't overclocking, their systems are running great, etc, yet they'll ask me what CPU cooler's I'd recommend to get the CPU cooler than the stock unit? WHY? WHY? WHY?
If you're looking for a hobby and like the intellectual challange of lowering temps of computer components (and I do at times too), well, that's one thing, but to blindly believe that "... Keeping the system cool will boost performance...", well, then I have a bridge to sell you might be interested in too.
If you thing the overclocking community is interested about cooling, then head on over to the SFF community (
http://www.sfftech.com/ is a good portal for this) and check out their issues. They have the same hardware everyone else is running in a case with a third the volume, and generally low-speed fans to keep things quiet. They know that a CPU running at 55 under load where the max-spec is 70 is fine, even though guys with full-size cases are worring about how to get that same CPU to run at 40 with a veritable hurricane of airflow and cooling.
Anyway, I've vented my speen. I'll duck now. ;-)
-Llama