I also disagree that the padlock view is best suited to scissors of any kind. Is there anybody out there that is successful using the padlock view like this? I've never heard of it. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think any of the top pilots use the padlock view for anything, much less in demanding maneuvers like rolling scissors.
I dont use padlock for scissors in AH, but in FA, padlock was my 1st choice for any type of fighting.
For those that dont know how the FA padlocks work a short description.
U have a few padlock buttons, most used is the "padlock nearest enemy" (especially useful in 1on1, but deadly in furballs

).
Normaly u set 2 buttons on ur stick, one with the "padlock nearest enemy" and one eith "forward view".
Now when u fight u normally constantly switch between both view, in padlock u check the enemies position, in forwrd view u check the stauts of ur own plane.
But FA padlock gives u also a good feeling of ur planes movement when u stay in it. And this is cause FA padlock always centers the tgt in the middle of the screen. Giving u the feeling of turing ur head while following ur tgt, not like in AH were padlock only changes between i.e. forward view and forward view 45 degree up.
In a move like the scissor, u can use the FA padlock to get an idea of the relative psoition of both planes u also can time the moment when to press the trigger, cause u "feel" when the other bird will cross infront of and pass through the bullet stream.
In FA the key to be a real good pilot is to master padlock, once u know it and how to use, u will never use instant (snap) views again, cause the 2 button method above is faster than everything i know.
But in AH padlock is really bad, it only get u killed, and is not of any use, this has alos soemthing to do with the thing, that u use the padlock tgt once u used another view, i.e. to check instruments
P.S. in the training pahse u will stall and crash a couple of planes but once u have it, u will have a real edge vs. pilots that dont know how to use it
[This message has been edited by Naudet (edited 03-29-2001).]